Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33184174›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Markov state modeling reveals alternative unbinding pathways for peptide-MHC complexes.

Jayvee R Abella, Dinler Antunes, Kyle Jackson, Gregory Lizée, Cecilia Clementi, Lydia E Kavraki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jayvee R AbellaDepartment of Computer Science, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005.ORCID 0000-0002-8574-1144
Dinler AntunesDepartment of Computer Science, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005.ORCID 0000-0001-7947-6455
Kyle JacksonDepartment of Melanoma Medical Oncology-Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030.ORCID 0000-0002-3711-2861
Gregory LizéeDepartment of Melanoma Medical Oncology-Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030.
Cecilia ClementiCenter for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005.ORCID 0000-0001-9221-2358
Lydia E KavrakiDepartment of Computer Science, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005; kavraki@rice.edu.

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINET15LM007093 · NLM · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI Lydia E. Kavraki · 1992 to 2026
$20.8M
NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peptide binding to major histocompatibility complexes (MHCs) is a central component of the immune system, and understanding the mechanism behind stable peptide-MHC binding will aid the development of immunotherapies. While MHC binding is mostly influenced by the identity of the so-called anchor positions of the peptide, secondary interactions from nonanchor positions are known to play a role in complex stability. However, current MHC-binding prediction methods lack an analysis of the major conformational states and might underestimate the impact of secondary interactions. In this work, we present an atomically detailed analysis of peptide-MHC binding that can reveal the contributions of any interaction toward stability. We propose a simulation framework that uses both umbrella sampling and adaptive sampling to generate a Markov state model (MSM) for a coronavirus-derived peptide (QFKDNVILL), bound to one of the most prevalent MHC receptors in humans (HLA-A24:02). While our model reaffirms the importance of the anchor positions of the peptide in establishing stable interactions, our model also reveals the underestimated importance of position 4 (p4), a nonanchor position. We confirmed our results by simulating the impact of specific peptide mutations and validated these predictions through competitive binding assays. By comparing the MSM of the wild-type system with those of the D4A and D4P mutations, our modeling reveals stark differences in unbinding pathways. The analysis presented here can be applied to any peptide-MHC complex of interest with a structural model as input, representing an important step toward comprehensive modeling of the MHC class I pathway.

Indexed as

Major Histocompatibility ComplexMarkov ChainsModels, MolecularAlanineBinding, CompetitiveComputer SimulationDNA Mutational AnalysisMutationPeptidesProlineProtein BindingAlaninePeptidesProlineadaptive samplingcompetitive binding assayMarkov state modelingpeptide–MHC binding stability

Identifiers

PMID33184174
PMCPMC7720115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.