ReviewESMO open2020
Sex-specific and gender-specific aspects in patient-reported outcomes.
Review in ESMO open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Selection of patient-reported outcome measures in pulmonary arterial hypertension clinical trials: a systematic review, meta-analysis and health-related quality of life framework.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025Pooled it
- Sex Differences in Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Surgical Hip Preservation Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The Iowa orthopaedic journal · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Feasibility of Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT) for adults on hemodialysis: a registry-based cluster randomized pilot trial.BMC nephrology · 2023Trial
- Sex Differences in Treatment Expectations, Satisfaction and Tolerance After Switching to CT-P17, an Adalimumab Biosimilar: A Post Hoc Analysis of the YU-MATTER Study.Rheumatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Bimekizumab Impact on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Plaque Psoriasis: 4-Year Results from BE SURE, BE VIVID, BE READY, and BE BRIGHT.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Sex-Based Differences Femoroacetabular Impingement and Hip Arthroscopy.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2025Review
- Functional analysis and the importance of ligament reconstruction after soft tissue sarcoma surgery around the knee joint -a Tokai musculoskeletal oncology consortium study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Beyond BRCA: A scoping review of person-centred care for women diagnosed with a BRCA gene mutation.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Adaptation and Linguistic Validation of Angioedema PROMs in Latvian for Assessing Recurrent Angioedema.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Implementation and Retrospective Examination of a Lung Cancer Survivorship Clinic in a Comprehensive Cancer Center.Clinical lung cancer · 2025Article
- Youths with Extreme Obesity: A High-Risk Group for Pain and Mental Health Impairments.Obesity facts · 2025Article
- How to interpret patient-reported outcomes? - Stratified adjusted minimal important changes for the EQ-5D-3L in hip and knee replacement patients.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2024Observational
- Sex and gender bias in chronic coronary syndromes research: analysis of studies used to inform the 2019 European Society of Cardiology guidelines.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2024Article
- Male football players have better patient-reported outcomes after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction compared with females.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Trait Mindfulness and Social Support Predict Lower Perceived Stress Burden in Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy.Advances in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Cognitive Symptoms Across Diverse Cancers.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Gender health gap pre- and post-joint arthroplasty: identifying affected patient-reported health domains.International journal for equity in health · 2024Article
- Article
- Updated normative data for the EORTC QLQ-C30 in the general Dutch population by age and sex: a cross-sectional panel research study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are important tools in patient-centred medicine and allow for individual assessment of symptom burden and aspects of patients' quality of life. While sex and gender differences have emerged in preclinical and clinical medicine, these differences are not adequately represented in the development and use of patient-reported outcome measures. However, even in personalised approaches, undesirable biases may occur when samples are unbalanced for certain characteristics, such as sex or gender. This review summarises the current status of the literature and trends in PROs with a focus on sex and gender aspects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.