Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33184088›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

What items should be included in an early warning score for remote assessment of suspected COVID-19? qualitative and Delphi study.

Trisha Greenhalgh, Paul Thompson, Sietse Weiringa, Ana Luisa Neves, Laiba Husain, Merlin Dunlop, Alexander Rushforth, David Nunan, Simon de Lusignan, Brendan Delaney

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04435041 (Remote-by-Default Care in the COVID-19 Pandemic), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04435041 completednot on this map

Remote-by-Default Care in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Addressing the Micro-, Meso-, and Macro-level Challenges of a Radical New Service Model

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity of OxfordRan2020 to 2022Enrolled103ConditionsCOVID-19
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Development and implementation of a community-based COVID-19 assessment centre in Selangor: A descriptive study.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Moral uncertainty: A case study of Covid-19.Patient education and counseling · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Long Covid - The illness narratives.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Trisha GreenhalghNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK trish.greenhalgh@phc.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2369-8088
Paul ThompsonDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sietse WeiringaNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ana Luisa NevesInstitute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7107-7211
Laiba HusainNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Merlin DunlopArdens Ltd, Oxford, UK.
Alexander RushforthNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
David NunanNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Simon de LusignanNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5613-6810
Brendan DelaneyInstitute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 25310
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo develop items for an early warning score (RECAP: REmote COVID-19 Assessment in Primary Care) for patients with suspected COVID-19 who need escalation to next level of care.

methodsThe study was based in UK primary healthcare. The mixed-methods design included rapid review, Delphi panel, interviews, focus groups and software development. Participants were 112 primary care clinicians and 50 patients recovered from COVID-19, recruited through social media, patient groups and snowballing. Using rapid literature review, we identified signs and symptoms which are commoner in severe COVID-19. Building a preliminary set of items from these, we ran four rounds of an online Delphi panel with 72 clinicians, the last incorporating fictional vignettes, collating data on R software. We refined the items iteratively in response to quantitative and qualitative feedback. Items in the penultimate round were checked against narrative interviews with 50 COVID-19 patients. We required, for each item, at least 80% clinician agreement on relevance, wording and cut-off values, and that the item addressed issues and concerns raised by patients. In focus groups, 40 clinicians suggested further refinements and discussed workability of the instrument in relation to local resources and care pathways. This informed design of an electronic template for primary care systems.

resultsThe prevalidation RECAP-V0 comprises a red flag alert box and 10 assessment items: pulse, shortness of breath or respiratory rate, trajectory of breathlessness, pulse oximeter reading (with brief exercise test if appropriate) or symptoms suggestive of hypoxia, temperature or fever symptoms, duration of symptoms, muscle aches, new confusion, shielded list and known risk factors for poor outcome. It is not yet known how sensitive or specific it is.

conclusionsItems on RECAP-V0 align strongly with published evidence, clinical judgement and patient experience. The validation phase of this study is ongoing. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04435041.

Indexed as

ChecklistEarly Warning ScoreTelemedicineBetacoronavirusConfusionCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Delphi TechniqueDisease ProgressionDyspneaFeverHeart RateHumansHypoxiaMyalgiaPandemicscovid-19health informaticsinfectious diseasesvirology

Identifiers

PMID33184088
PMCPMC7662139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.