Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33184084›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

NTNU intranasal naloxone trial (NINA-1) study protocol for a double-blind, double-dummy, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial comparing intranasal 1.4 mg to intramuscular 0.8 mg naloxone for prehospital use.

Arne Kristian Skulberg, Ida Tylleskär, Anne-Cathrine Braarud, Jostein Dale, Fridtjof Heyerdahl, Sindre Mellesmo, Morten Valberg, Ola Dale

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03518021 (NTNU Intranasal Naloxone Trial - a Double Blinded, Double Dummy, Randomized Controlled Trial of Intranasal Naloxone for Pre-hospital Use), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03518021 phase3completednot on this map

NTNU Intranasal Naloxone Trial - a Double Blinded, Double Dummy, Randomized Controlled Trial of Intranasal Naloxone for Pre-hospital Use

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyRan2018 to 2020Enrolled286ConditionsOverdose, Drug AbuseArmsNaloxone, intranasal, placebo, intranasal, Naloxone, intramuscular, placebo, intramuscular
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Arne Kristian SkulbergDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway arne.skulberg@ntnu.no.ORCID 0000-0002-1735-4820
Ida TylleskärDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Anne-Cathrine BraarudDivision of Prehospital Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Jostein DaleClinic of Emergency Medicine and Prehospital Care, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Fridtjof HeyerdahlDivision of Prehospital Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Sindre MellesmoDivision of Prehospital Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Morten ValbergOslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Ola DaleDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NONorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOStiftelsen Norsk Luftambulanse · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIntranasal (IN) naloxone is widely used to treat opioid overdoses. The advantage of nasal administration compared with injection lies in its suitability for administration by lay people as it is needless. Approved formulations of nasal naloxone with bioavailability of approximately 50% have only undergone trials in healthy volunteers, while off-label nasal sprays with low bioavailability have been studied in patients. Randomised clinical trials are needed to investigate efficacy and safety of approved IN naloxone in patients suffering overdose. This study investigates whether the administration of 1.4 mg naloxone in 0.1 mL per dose is non-inferior to 0.8 mg intramuscular injection in patients treated for opioid overdose. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Sponsor is the Norwegian University of Science and Technology. The study has been developed in collaboration with user representatives. The primary endpoint is the restoration of spontaneous respiration≥10 breaths/min based on a sample of 200 opioid overdose cases. Double-dummy design ensures blinding, which will be maintained until the database is locked. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Norwegian Medicines Agency and Regional Ethics Committees (REC: 2016/2000). It adheres to the Good Clinical Practice guidelines as set out by the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use.Informed consent will be sought through a differentiated model. This allows for deferred consent after inclusion for patients who have regained the ability to consent. Patients who are unable to consent prior to discharge by emergency services are given written information and can withdraw at a later date in line with user recommendations. Metadata will be published in the Norwegian University of Science and Technology Open repository. Deidentified individual participant data will be made available to recipients conditional of data processor agreement being entered. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: EudraCT Registry (2016-004072-22) and Clinicaltrials.gov Registry (NCT03518021).

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesAdministration, IntranasalAdolescentAgedDouble-Blind MethodDrug OverdoseEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsNorwayRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicNaloxoneNarcotic Antagonistsaccident & emergency medicineclinical pharmacologymedical ethicsstatistics & research methodstoxicology

Identifiers

PMID33184084
PMCPMC7662429
OpenAlexW3105462420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.