ArticleInfectious diseases of poverty2020
A comprehensive research agenda for zero leprosy.
Article in Infectious diseases of poverty, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research Priority Setting Exercises in Neglected Tropical Diseases: A Systematic Mapping Review.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2026Pooled it
- Structured digital health intervention for leprosy awareness: a case study of analyzing public engagement and sentiment in a Sri Lankan leprosy awareness campaign on Facebook.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Article
- Advancing Mycobacterium leprae transmission research: Insights from the R2STOP fund.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- Barriers to leprosy elimination in Bolivia: Exploring perspectives and experiences of medical professionals and leprosy patients-A phenomenological study.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- Article
- Understanding reasons for delay in diagnosis of leprosy in Pakistan: A qualitative study.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- Participatory development of Indonesia's national action plan for zero leprosy: strategies and interventions.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Experiences of Patients Living in a Unique Leprosy Hospice in Greece: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.Cureus · 2024Article
- Interventions to reduce leprosy related stigma: A systematic review.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Identifying clusters of leprosy patients in India: A comparison of methods.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2022Article
- Implementation approaches for leprosy prevention with single-dose rifampicin: A support tool for decision making.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2022Review
- A Bibliometric Analysis of Leprosy during 2000-2021 from Web of Science Database.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- RLEP LAMP for the laboratory confirmation of leprosy: towards a point-of-care test.BMC infectious diseases · 2021Article
- Susceptibility and resistance in leprosy: Studies in the mouse model.Immunological reviews · 2021Review
- Towards zero leprosy: Dream or vision?The Indian journal of medical research · 2021Article
- Persistence of Bacteriological Index After 1 Year of Multidrug Therapy Intake in Hansen's Patients: An Indication to Strengthen the Antimicrobial Surveillance.Indian dermatology online journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLeprosy control achieved dramatic success in the 1980s-1990s with the implementation of short course multidrug therapy, which reduced the global prevalence of leprosy to less than 1 in 10 000 population. However, a period of relative stagnation in leprosy control followed this achievement, and only limited further declines in the global number of new cases reported have been achieved over the past decade. MAIN TEXT: In 2016, major stakeholders called for the development of an innovative and comprehensive leprosy strategy aimed at reducing the incidence of leprosy, lowering the burden of disability and discrimination, and interrupting transmission. This led to the establishment of the Global Partnership for Zero Leprosy (GPZL) in 2018, with partners aligned around a shared Action Framework committed to achieving the WHO targets by 2030 through national leprosy program capacity-building, resource mobilisation and an enabling research agenda. GPZL convened over 140 experts from more than 20 countries to develop a research agenda to achieve zero leprosy. The result is a detailed research agenda focusing on diagnostics, mapping, digital technology and innovation, disability, epidemiological modelling and investment case, implementation research, stigma, post exposure prophylaxis and transmission, and vaccines. This research agenda is aligned with the research priorities identified by other stakeholders.
conclusionsDeveloping and achieving consensus on the research agenda for zero leprosy is a significant step forward for the leprosy community. In a next step, research programmes must be developed, with individual components of the research agenda requiring distinct expertise, varying in resource needs, and operating over different timescales. Moving toward zero leprosy now requires partner alignment and new investments at all stages of the research process, from discovery to implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.