Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33183339›Full record

ArticleInfectious diseases of poverty2020

A comprehensive research agenda for zero leprosy.

Peter Steinmann, Courtenay Dusenbury, David Addiss, Fareed Mirza, W Cairns S Smith

Open access · goldAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious diseases of poverty, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Health science reports · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. A Bibliometric Analysis of Leprosy during 2000-2021 from Web of Science Database.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Towards zero leprosy: Dream or vision?The Indian journal of medical research · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Peter SteinmannSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, 4051, Basel, Switzerland. Peter.steinmann@swisstph.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4800-3019
Courtenay DusenburyGlobal Partnership for Zero Leprosy, Task Force for Global Health, Decatur, GA, USA.
David AddissFocus Area for Compassion and Ethics, Task Force for Global Health, Decatur, GA, USA.
Fareed MirzaNovartis Foundation, Basel, Switzerland.
W Cairns S SmithUniversity of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
The Task Force for Global Health · USNovartis Foundation · CHSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CHUniversity of Aberdeen · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeprosy control achieved dramatic success in the 1980s-1990s with the implementation of short course multidrug therapy, which reduced the global prevalence of leprosy to less than 1 in 10 000 population. However, a period of relative stagnation in leprosy control followed this achievement, and only limited further declines in the global number of new cases reported have been achieved over the past decade. MAIN TEXT: In 2016, major stakeholders called for the development of an innovative and comprehensive leprosy strategy aimed at reducing the incidence of leprosy, lowering the burden of disability and discrimination, and interrupting transmission. This led to the establishment of the Global Partnership for Zero Leprosy (GPZL) in 2018, with partners aligned around a shared Action Framework committed to achieving the WHO targets by 2030 through national leprosy program capacity-building, resource mobilisation and an enabling research agenda. GPZL convened over 140 experts from more than 20 countries to develop a research agenda to achieve zero leprosy. The result is a detailed research agenda focusing on diagnostics, mapping, digital technology and innovation, disability, epidemiological modelling and investment case, implementation research, stigma, post exposure prophylaxis and transmission, and vaccines. This research agenda is aligned with the research priorities identified by other stakeholders.

conclusionsDeveloping and achieving consensus on the research agenda for zero leprosy is a significant step forward for the leprosy community. In a next step, research programmes must be developed, with individual components of the research agenda requiring distinct expertise, varying in resource needs, and operating over different timescales. Moving toward zero leprosy now requires partner alignment and new investments at all stages of the research process, from discovery to implementation.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchBacterial VaccinesDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansIncidenceLeprostatic AgentsLeprosyMycobacterium lepraePost-Exposure ProphylaxisResearch DesignBacterial VaccinesLeprostatic AgentsLeprosyMycobacterium lepraePrioritiesResearchStrategyZero leprosy

Identifiers

PMID33183339
PMCPMC7658911
OpenAlexW3103010395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.