SynthesisBMC cancer2020
Breast and cervical cancer screening services in Malawi: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Barriers and Facilitators to Participation in Health Screening: an Umbrella Review Across Conditions.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2022Pooled it
- Determinants of cervical cancer screening among women living with HIV in Lesotho using nationally representative 2023/24 DHS data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Empowering early detection: a pioneering breast health training course for healthcare workers in Malawi.BMJ global health · 2025Article
- Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women in Malawi: An Integrative Literature Review.Oncology nursing forum · 2025Review
- Client perspectives and satisfaction with integrating facility and community-based HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening with family planning: a mixed method study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Real-world breast cancer treatment patterns and guideline-concordant treatment completion among Malawian women.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- Attitudes of women towards screening, prevention and treatment of cervical cancer in Namibia.Health SA = SA Gesondheid · 2024Article
- Baseline assessment of cervical cancer screening and treatment capacity in 25 counties in Kenya, 2022.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Influence of distance to health facilities on clinical breast cancer screening behaviour among women in five sub-Saharan African countries.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Explaining socioeconomic inequality in cervical cancer screening uptake in Malawi.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Primary health care workers perspective towards cancer in Fiji: a qualitative study.Primary health care research & development · 2022Article
- Health behavior and social crisis in the era of COVID-19 in Malawi: A decolonizing approach to a qualitative study.Nursing outlookArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo identify and to assess factors enhancing or hindering the delivery of breast and cervical cancer screening services in Malawi with regard to accessibility, uptake, acceptability and effectiveness.
methodsSystematic review of published scientific evidence. A search of six bibliographic databases and grey literature was executed to identify relevant studies conducted in Malawi in the English language, with no time or study design restrictions. Data extraction was conducted in Excel and evidence synthesis followed a thematic analysis approach to identify and compare emerging themes.
resultsOne hundred and one unique records were retrieved and 6 studies were selected for final inclusion in the review. Multiple factors affect breast and cervical cancer service delivery in Malawi, operating at three interlinked levels. At the patient level, lack of knowledge and awareness of the disease, location, poor screening environment and perceived quality of care may act as deterrent to participation in screening; at the health facility level, services are affected by the availability of resources and delivery modalities; and at the healthcare system level, inadequate funding and staffing (distribution, supervision, retention), and lack of appropriate monitoring and guidelines may have a negative impact on services. Convenience of screening, in terms of accessibility (location, opening times) and integration with other health services (e.g. reproductive or HIV services), was found to have a positive effect on service uptake. Building awareness of cancer and related services, and offering quality screening (dedicated room, privacy, staff professionalism etc.) are significant determinants of patient satisfaction.
conclusionsCapitalising on these lessons is essential to strengthen breast and cervical cancer service delivery in Malawi, to increase early detection and to improve survival of women affected by the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.