Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33182806›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2020

Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis: Endoscopic and Surgical Resection for Ampullary Lesions.

Christian Heise, Einas Abou Ali, Dirk Hasenclever, Francesco Auriemma, Aiste Gulla, Sara Regner, Sébastien Gaujoux, Marcus Hollenbach

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Endoscopic Papillectomy for Ampullary Tumors in Older Patients: Balancing Oncologic Benefit and Geriatric Risk.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Endoscopic Management of Ampulla of Vater Tumors].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. [IDEN Consensus on Management of Antithrombotic Agents in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Clinical outcomes: endoscopic resection of duodenal ampullary lesions.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Christian HeiseDepartment of Medicine I-Gastroenterology, Pulmonology, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06097 Halle, Germany.
Einas Abou AliDepartment of Gastroenterology, Digestive Oncology and Endoscopy, Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, 75014 Paris, France.
Dirk HasencleverInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology (IMISE), University of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Francesco AuriemmaDigestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy.
Aiste GullaDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Vilnius University, 01513 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Sara RegnerDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Section for Surgery, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden.
Sébastien GaujouxDepartment of Pancreatic and Endocrine Surgery, Pitié-Salpetriere Hospital, Médecine Sorbonne Université, 75000 Paris, France.
Marcus HollenbachMedical Department II, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Leipzig University · DEDélégation Paris 5 · FRLund University · SEMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DESorbonne Université · FRVilnius University · LT

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Open Access Funding
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ampullary lesions (ALs) can be treated by endoscopic (EA) or surgical ampullectomy (SA) or pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). However, EA carries significant risk of incomplete resection while surgical interventions can lead to substantial morbidity. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis for R0, adverse-events (AEs) and recurrence between EA, SA and PD. Electronic databases were searched from 1990 to 2018. Outcomes were calculated as pooled means using fixed and random-effects models and the Freeman-Tukey-Double-Arcsine-Proportion-model. We identified 59 independent studies. The pooled R0 rate was 76.6% (71.8-81.4%, I

Indexed as

ampulla of Vaterampullectomypancreaticoduodenectomypapillectomytrans-duodenal ampullectomy

Identifiers

PMID33182806
PMCPMC7696506
OpenAlexW3101459179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.