Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33182746›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Cell Type-Specific Adhesion and Migration on Laser-Structured Opaque Surfaces.

Jörn Schaeske, Elena Fadeeva, Sabrina Schlie-Wolter, Andrea Deiwick, Boris N Chichkov, Alexandra Ingendoh-Tsakmakidis, Meike Stiesch, Andreas Winkel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jörn SchaeskeDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry and Biomedical Materials Science, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Elena FadeevaInstitute of Quantum Optics, Leibniz University of Hannover, Welfengarten 1, 30167 Hannover, Germany.
Sabrina Schlie-WolterInstitute of Quantum Optics, Leibniz University of Hannover, Welfengarten 1, 30167 Hannover, Germany.
Andrea DeiwickInstitute of Quantum Optics, Leibniz University of Hannover, Welfengarten 1, 30167 Hannover, Germany.
Boris N ChichkovInstitute of Quantum Optics, Leibniz University of Hannover, Welfengarten 1, 30167 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8129-7373
Alexandra Ingendoh-TsakmakidisDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry and Biomedical Materials Science, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4665-8022
Meike StieschDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry and Biomedical Materials Science, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Andreas WinkelDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry and Biomedical Materials Science, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1850-1658

Funding

Niedersächsisches Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kultur WVZN2860Volkswagen Foundation WVZN2860
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cytocompatibility is essential for implant approval. However, initial in vitro screenings mainly include the quantity of adherent immortalized cells and cytotoxicity. Other vital parameters, such as cell migration and an in-depth understanding of the interaction between native tissue cells and implant surfaces, are rarely considered. We investigated different laser-fabricated spike structures using primary and immortalized cell lines of fibroblasts and osteoblasts and included quantification of the cell area, aspect ratio, and focal adhesions. Furthermore, we examined the three-dimensional cell interactions with spike topographies and developed a tailored migration assay for long-term monitoring on opaque materials. While fibroblasts and osteoblasts on small spikes retained their normal morphology, cells on medium and large spikes sank into the structures, affecting the composition of the cytoskeleton and thereby changing cell shape. Up to 14 days, migration appeared stronger on small spikes, probably as a consequence of adequate focal adhesion formation and an intact cytoskeleton, whereas human primary cells revealed differences in comparison to immortalized cell lines. The use of primary cells, analysis of the cell-implant structure interaction as well as cell migration might strengthen the evaluation of cytocompatibility and thereby improve the validity regarding the putative in vivo performance of implant material.

Indexed as

3T3 CellsAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCell AdhesionCell MovementCells, CulturedCell ShapeCytoskeletonFibroblastsFocal AdhesionsHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalLasersMaterials TestingMiceMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningBiocompatible MaterialsTitaniumbiomaterialscell exclusion assaycell proliferationcell spreadingcytocompatibilityfocal adhesionin vitro screeningprimary vs. immortalized cell linesspike structures

Identifiers

PMID33182746
PMCPMC7696563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.