Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33182567›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

AK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks.

Yongbeom Kwon, Woong-Hee Shin, Junsu Ko, Juyong Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Improved Prediction of Ligand-Protein Binding Affinities by Meta-modeling.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yongbeom KwonDepartment of Chemistry, Kangwon National University, Gangwon-do, Chuncheon 24341, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7858-2077
Woong-Hee ShinDepartment of Chemical Science Education, Sunchon National University, Jeollanam-do, Suncheon 57922, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3462-0243
Junsu KoArontier, 241 Gangnam-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06735, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7416-4591
Juyong LeeDepartment of Chemistry, Kangwon National University, Gangwon-do, Chuncheon 24341, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1174-4358

Funding

Arontier C1014914-01-01National Research Foundation of Korea 2018R1C1B600543513National Research Foundation of Korea 2019M3E5D4066897National Research Foundation of Korea 2019M3E5D4066898National Research Foundation of Korea 2020R1F1A1075998National Supercomputing Center with supercomputing resources KSC-2018-CRE-0039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prediction of the binding affinity of a protein-ligand complex is essential for efficient and successful rational drug design. Therefore, many binding affinity prediction methods have been developed. In recent years, since deep learning technology has become powerful, it is also implemented to predict affinity. In this work, a new neural network model that predicts the binding affinity of a protein-ligand complex structure is developed. Our model predicts the binding affinity of a complex using the ensemble of multiple independently trained networks that consist of multiple channels of 3-D convolutional neural network layers. Our model was trained using the 3772 protein-ligand complexes from the refined set of the PDBbind-2016 database and tested using the core set of 285 complexes. The benchmark results show that the Pearson correlation coefficient between the predicted binding affinities by our model and the experimental data is 0.827, which is higher than the state-of-the-art binding affinity prediction scoring functions. Additionally, our method ranks the relative binding affinities of possible multiple binders of a protein quite accurately, comparable to the other scoring functions. Last, we measured which structural information is critical for predicting binding affinity and found that the complementarity between the protein and ligand is most important.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerProtein BindingComputer-Aided DesignDatabases, ProteinDeep LearningDrug DesignDrug DiscoveryHumansLigandsMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationProteinsUser-Computer InterfaceLigandsProteinsbinding affinity predictionconvolutional neural networkdeep learningdocking scoreprotein-ligand binding affinityResNext

Identifiers

PMID33182567
PMCPMC7697539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.