Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33182551›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2020

Effectiveness of Phage-Based Inhibition of

Iwona Kawacka, Agnieszka Olejnik-Schmidt, Marcin Schmidt, Anna Sip

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  11. Genomic characterization of fourFood science and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Phage diversity in One Health.Essays in biochemistry · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Iwona KawackaDepartment of Food Biotechnology and Microbiology, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 48, PL-60-627 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8010-7531
Agnieszka Olejnik-SchmidtDepartment of Food Biotechnology and Microbiology, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 48, PL-60-627 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5418-5632
Marcin SchmidtDepartment of Food Biotechnology and Microbiology, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 48, PL-60-627 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8417-2245
Anna SipDepartment of Food Biotechnology and Microbiology, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 48, PL-60-627 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0120-2734

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Providing safe products and compliance of legal requirements is still a great challenge for food manufacturers regarding microbiological safety, especially in the context of

Indexed as

Bacteriophagesbiopreservationfood qualityListeria monocytogenessafety

Identifiers

PMID33182551
PMCPMC7697088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.