Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33182510›Full record

ReviewCancers2020

Recurrence Risk after Radical Colorectal Cancer Surgery-Less Than before, But How High Is It?

Erik Osterman, Klara Hammarström, Israa Imam, Emerik Osterlund, Tobias Sjöblom, Bengt Glimelius

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. BioMed research international · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Survival analysis in pT1-3 and paracolic lymph-node invasion colorectal cancer: the prognostic role of positive paracolic lymph-node ratio for adjuvant chemotherapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Erik OstermanDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1621-7872
Klara HammarströmDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.
Israa ImamDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.
Emerik OsterlundDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0973-6332
Tobias SjöblomDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.
Bengt GlimeliusDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

Swedish Cancer Society 190382
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adjuvant chemotherapy aims at eradicating tumour cells sometimes present after radical surgery for a colorectal cancer (CRC) and thereby diminish the recurrence rate and prolong time to recurrence (TTR). Remaining tumour cells will lead to recurrent disease that is usually fatal. Adjuvant therapy is administered based upon the estimated recurrence risk, which in turn defines the need for this treatment. This systematic overview aims at describing whether the need has decreased since trials showing that adjuvant chemotherapy provides benefits in colon cancer were performed decades ago. Thanks to other improvements than the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy, such as better staging, improved surgery, the use of radiotherapy and more careful pathology, recurrence risks have decreased. Methodological difficulties including intertrial comparisons decades apart and the present selective use of adjuvant therapy prevent an accurate estimate of the magnitude of the decreased need. Furthermore, most trials do not report recurrence rates or TTR, only disease-free and overall survival (DFS/OS). Fewer colon cancer patients, particularly in stage II but also in stage III, today display a sufficient need for adjuvant treatment considering the burden of treatment, especially when oxaliplatin is added. In rectal cancer, neo-adjuvant treatment will be increasingly used, diminishing the need for adjuvant treatment.

Indexed as

adjuvant treatmentchemotherapycolon cancercolorectal cancerrectal cancerrecurrence risksystematic overview

Identifiers

PMID33182510
PMCPMC7696064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.