ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Mimicking the Mechanical Properties of Aortic Tissue with Pattern-Embedded 3D Printing for a Realistic Phantom.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D-printed in vitro models of Stanford type B aortic dissection: A scoping review.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2025Article
- Design of a Soft Robotic Artificial Cardiac Wall.Artificial organs · 2025Article
- Article
- Numerical Evaluation of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Utilizing Finite Element Method.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Metamaterial design for aortic aneurysm simulation using 3D printing.3D printing in medicine · 2024Article
- Fabrication and assessment of a bio-inspired synthetic tracheal tissue model for tracheal tube cuff leakage testing.BJA open · 2024Article
- Additively manufactured test phantoms for mimicking soft tissue radiation attenuation in CBCT using Polyjet technology.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2023Article
- Development of a patient-specific chest computed tomography imaging phantom with realistic lung lesions using silicone casting and three-dimensional printing.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Assessment of different manufacturing techniques for the production of bioartificial scaffolds as soft organ transplant substitutes.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- 3D-Printed multi-material liver model with simultaneous mechanical and radiological tissue-mimicking features for improved realism.International journal of bioprinting · 2023Article
- Fabrication of Compliant and Transparent Hollow Cerebral Vascular Phantoms for In Vitro Studies Using 3D Printing and Spin-Dip Coating.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Rehearsal simulation to determine the size of device for left atrial appendage occlusion using patient-specific 3D-printed phantoms.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- State-of-the-art silicone molded models for simulation of arterial switch operation: Innovation with parting-and-assembly strategy.JTCVS techniques · 2022Article
- Mechanical Properties of Flexible TPU-Based 3D Printed Lattice Structures: Role of Lattice Cut Direction and Architecture.Polymers · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
3D printing technology has been extensively applied in the medical field, but the ability to replicate tissues that experience significant loads and undergo substantial deformation, such as the aorta, remains elusive. Therefore, this study proposed a method to imitate the mechanical characteristics of the aortic wall by 3D printing embedded patterns and combining two materials with different physical properties. First, we determined the mechanical properties of the selected base materials (Agilus and Dragonskin 30) and pattern materials (VeroCyan and TPU 95A) and performed tensile testing. Three patterns were designed and embedded in printed Agilus-VeroCyan and Dragonskin 30-TPU 95A specimens. Tensile tests were then performed on the printed specimens, and the stress-strain curves were evaluated. The samples with one of the two tested orthotropic patterns exceeded the tensile strength and strain properties of a human aorta. Specifically, a tensile strength of 2.15 ± 0.15 MPa and strain at breaking of 3.18 ± 0.05 mm/mm were measured in the study; the human aorta is considered to have tensile strength and strain at breaking of 2.0-3.0 MPa and 2.0-2.3 mm/mm, respectively. These findings indicate the potential for developing more representative aortic phantoms based on the approach in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.