Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33182317›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2020

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceived Barriers toward Genetic Testing and Pharmacogenomics among Healthcare Workers in the United Arab Emirates: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Azhar T Rahma, Mahanna Elsheik, Bassam R Ali, Iffat Elbarazi, George P Patrinos, Luai A Ahmed, Fatma Al Maskari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Reimagining pharmacology education.Pharmacological reviews · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. An objective evaluation of fundamental pharmacogenomics knowledge among pharmacists and pharmacy students.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Azhar T RahmaInstitute of Public Health, College of Medicine & Health Sciences, UAE University, Al Ain P.O. Box 17666, UAE.ORCID 0000-0002-8347-453X
Mahanna ElsheikInstitute of Public Health, College of Medicine & Health Sciences, UAE University, Al Ain P.O. Box 17666, UAE.ORCID 0000-0001-6701-4181
Bassam R AliZayed Center for Health Sciences, UAE University, Al Ain P.O. Box 17666, UAE.ORCID 0000-0003-1306-6618
Iffat ElbaraziInstitute of Public Health, College of Medicine & Health Sciences, UAE University, Al Ain P.O. Box 17666, UAE.ORCID 0000-0001-7151-2175
George P PatrinosZayed Center for Health Sciences, UAE University, Al Ain P.O. Box 17666, UAE.ORCID 0000-0002-0519-7776
Luai A AhmedInstitute of Public Health, College of Medicine & Health Sciences, UAE University, Al Ain P.O. Box 17666, UAE.ORCID 0000-0001-5292-8212
Fatma Al MaskariInstitute of Public Health, College of Medicine & Health Sciences, UAE University, Al Ain P.O. Box 17666, UAE.ORCID 0000-0001-6598-4942

Funding

Zayed Center for Health Sciences, UAE University 31R175
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to successfully translate the scientific models of genetic testing and pharmacogenomics into clinical practice, empowering healthcare workers with the right knowledge and functional understanding on the subject is essential. Limited research in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) have assessed healthcare worker stances towards genomics. This study aimed to assess healthcare workers' knowledge and attitudes on genetic testing. A cross-sectional study was conducted among healthcare workers practicing in either public or private hospitals or clinics as pharmacists, nurses, physicians, managers, and allied health. Participants were recruited randomly and via snowball techniques. Surveys were collected between April and September 2019; out of 552 respondents, 63.4% were female, the mean age was 38 (±9.6) years old. The mean knowledge score was 5.2 (±2.3) out of nine, which shows a fair level of knowledge. The scores of respondents of pharmacy were 5.1 (±2.5), medicine 6.0 (±2.0), and nursing 4.8 (±2.1). All participants exhibited a fair knowledge level about genetic testing and pharmacogenomics. Of the respondents, 91.9% showed a positive attitude regarding availability of genetic testing. The top identified barrier to implementation was the cost of testing (62%), followed by lack of training or education and insurance coverage (57.8% and 57.2%, respectively). Building upon the positive attitudes and tackling the barriers and challenges will pave the road for full implementation of genetic testing and pharmacogenomics in the UAE. We recommend empowering healthcare workers by improving needed and tailored competencies related to their area of practice. We strongly urge the stakeholders to streamline and benchmark the workflow, algorithm, and guidelines to standardize the health and electronic system. Lastly, we advocate utilizing technology and electronic decision support as well as the translational report to back up healthcare workers in the UAE.

Indexed as

genetic counselinggeneticshealth personnel attitudesmedicalpharmacogenomics

Identifiers

PMID33182317
PMCPMC7711841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.