ArticleMedicine2020
Acupoint injection versus sacral canal injection in lumbar disc herniation: A protocol of randomized controlled trial.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBoth acupoint injection and sacral canal injection are widely adopted in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH), but there are still doubts about the effectiveness and safety of the 2 methods. Therefore, the objective of the randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of acupoint injection and sacral canal injection in the treatment of LDH.
methodThis is a prospective randomized controlled trial to study the effectiveness and safety of acupoint injection and sacral canal injection in the treatment of LDH. With the approval by the clinical research ethics committee of our hospital, patients were randomly included into 1 of 2 treatment protocols:Patients, doctors, nurses, and research assistants responsible for collecting data were blinded to group allocation. Main outcome observation indicator: visual analogue scale; secondary outcome observation indicator: Oswestry disability index scores; paresthesia score; adverse reactions. Data were analyzed using the statistical software package SPSS version 25.0 (Chicago, IL). DISCUSSION: The effectiveness and safety of acupoint injection and sacral canal injection in the treatment of LDH were evaluated in this study, and the results of this trial would establish clinical evidence for the adoption of acupoint injection or sacral canal injection to treat LDH. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DOI 10.17605 / OSF.IO / VTFUD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.