ArticleMedicine2020
Comparison of the effects of reconstruction of the lateral ankle ligaments using peroneus longus and peroneus brevis tendon graft.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Addressing diagnostic challenges in neglected Bosworth dislocation with open reduction and soft tissue reconstruction: a case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- Differences and similarities in muscle architecture of fibularis longus and brevis-An observational descriptive cross-sectional and feasibility study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Observational
- Design and development of a new type of phimosis dilatation retractor for children.World journal of clinical cases · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peroneus longus and peroneus brevis tendon grafts have been frequently used to reconstruct the lateral ankle ligaments. However, there is no literature comparing the effect of the 2 methods. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of 2 autologous tendon transplants on ankle joint activity.This retrospective study included 100 adult patients with chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI) who underwent surgery from January 2014 to December 2017. Group A (50 patients): Reconstruction of the lateral ankle ligaments using the anterior half of peroneus longus tendon graft; Group B (50 patients): Using the anterior half of peroneus brevis tendon graft. Outcomes were assessed by comparing pre- and postoperative AOFAS scores, VAS pain scores, and Karlsson scores, and the radiographic assessment included talar tilt and anterior talar translation. A sensitive dynamometer was used before and after surgery to assess inversion, valgus, plantarflexion, and dorsiflexion strength to evaluate changes in muscle strength in the patients feet.Postoperatively, 88 patients were followed up for 12 to 24 months, including 46 cases in group A and 42 in group B. No severe complications were recorded in the 2 groups. There were significant pre- to post-operative differences between the groups. No significant differences were observed in the postoperative scores and muscle strength changes between the groups. However, the number of patients with decreased valgus strength in group B was statistically significant compared with group A.Both methods can improve the stability of the ankle joint, but the peroneus longus tendon has little effect on the postoperative muscle strength of the foot and should be used as the preferred surgical treatment for the treatment of CLAI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.