ArticleMedicine2020
Cognitive-behavioural reflective training for improving critical thinking disposition of nursing students.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cognitive-behaviour intervention for critical thinking disposition of religion and social science students.Medicine · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Evaluating Socratic inquiry, reflection and argumentation as strategies for critical thinking.Curationis · 2025Article
- Article
- Disputing and challenging academic procrastination behaviors in students using REBT approach.Medicine · 2025Article
- Moderated mediating effects of gender among the components of critical thinking disposition in undergraduate students.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Workplace Stress in Portuguese Oncology Nurses Delivering Palliative Care: A Pilot Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2022Article
- Intervention for Treating Depression in Parents of Children with Intellectual Disability of Down's Syndrome: A Sample of Nigerian Parents.Journal of rational-emotive and cognitive-behavior therapy : RET · 2022Article
- Developing mental health competency in undergraduate nursing students amid pandemic: A hybrid model approach.Teaching and learning in nursing : official journal of the National Organization for Assciate Degree Nursing · 2022Article
- Testing the Efficacy of Family Health-Model of REBT on Family Values and Quality of Family Life Among Parents of Children with Visual Impairment.Journal of rational-emotive and cognitive-behavior therapy : RET · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectiveThe importance of critical thinking in improving treatment practices in, for instance, the nursing profession, cannot be overemphasized. Despite this importance, empirical studies have shown that helping strategies to train learners on critical thinking disposition are needed. Given this knowledge gap, this study investigated the impacts of cognitive-behavioral reflective training for improving the critical thinking disposition of nursing students.
methodOf all the students screened, a total of 167 participants were assigned to the treatment group and waitlisted control group. A researchers-developed training program aimed at improving critical thinking disposition was delivered in English language by therapists.
resultsRepeated-measures ANOVA showed that there was no significant difference between the critical thinking disposition of nursing students in the treatment and control groups as measured by CTDI-M at the posttest. At the posttreatment and follow-up measures, there were consistently improved impacts of CBRT on the critical thinking disposition of nursing students in Nigeria as measured by CTDI-M.
conclusionFollowing the results, we concluded that cognitive-behavioral reflective training was beneficial and had sustained improvement in enhancing the critical thinking disposition of nursing students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.