Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33181638›Full record

ArticleMedicine2020

Plantar thermography predicts freedom from major amputation after endovascular therapy in critical limb ischemic patients.

Wei-Chun Chang, Chi-Yen Wang, Yutsung Cheng, Yu-Po Hung, Tzu-Hsiang Lin, Wei-Jhong Chen, Chieh-Shou Su, Chiann-Yi Hsu, Tsun-Jui Liu, Wen-Lieng Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Detecting Changes in Tissue Perfusion With Hyperspectral Imaging and Thermal Imaging Following Endovascular Treatment for Peripheral Arterial Disease.Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wei-Chun ChangCardiovascular Center, Taichung Veterans General Hospital.
Chi-Yen WangCardiovascular Center, Taichung Veterans General Hospital.
Yutsung ChengCardiovascular Center, Taichung Veterans General Hospital.
Yu-Po HungCardiovascular Center, Taichung Veterans General Hospital.
Tzu-Hsiang LinCardiovascular Center, Taichung Veterans General Hospital.
Wei-Jhong ChenCardiovascular Center, Taichung Veterans General Hospital.
Chieh-Shou SuCardiovascular Center, Taichung Veterans General Hospital.
Chiann-Yi HsuDepartment of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Tsun-Jui LiuCardiovascular Center, Taichung Veterans General Hospital.
Wen-Lieng LeeCardiovascular Center, Taichung Veterans General Hospital.
Taichung Veterans General Hospital · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWTunghai University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although plantar thermography can evaluate the immediate perfusion result after an endovascular therapy (EVT) has been performed, a relevant wound outcome study is still lacking.This study was to investigate whether angiosome-based plantar thermography could predict wound healing and freedom from major amputation after EVT in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI).All 124 patients with CLI (Rutherford category 5 and 6) who underwent EVT from January 2017 to February 2019 were prospectively enrolled. All patients received thermography both before and after EVT. Both wound healing and freedom from major amputation at the 6-month follow-up period were recorded. There were 61 patients in the healing group and 63 patients in the non-healing group, whereas the major amputation total was 14 patients. The mean pre- and post-EVT temperature of the foot was significantly higher in the healing group than in the non-healing group (30.78 °C vs 29.42 °C, P = .015; and 32.34 °C vs 30.96 °C, P = .004, respectively). DIFF2 was significantly lower in the non-healing group (-1.38 vs -0.90, P = .009). DIFF1 and DIFF2 were significantly lower in the amputation group (-1.85 °C vs -1.11 °C, P = .026; and -1.82 °C vs -1.08 °C, P = .004). Multivariate analysis showed that DIFF2 stood out as an independent predictor for freedom from major amputation (hazard ratio 0.51, P = .045). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed a DIFF2 cut-off value of -1.30 °C, which best predicts freedom from major amputation.Plantar thermography is associated with wound healing and helps predict freedom from major amputation in CLI patients undergoing EVT.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAmputation, SurgicalEndovascular ProceduresExtremitiesFemaleHumansIschemiaLimb SalvageMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsThermography

Identifiers

PMID33181638
PMCPMC7668514
OpenAlexW3104009710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.