ArticleEBioMedicine2020
Deep learning-based clustering robustly identified two classes of sepsis with both prognostic and predictive values.
Article in EBioMedicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine Learning Models for the Identification of Prognostic and Predictive Cancer Biomarkers: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Pooled it
- Precision medicine in sepsis: reappraising glucocorticoid therapy through the lens of molecular endotypes.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026Review
- New and Emerging Research Models for Sepsis.Cells · 2026Review
- Identification and Characterization of Sepsis Phenotypes in an Indian Cohort.Critical care research and practice · 2026Article
- Deriving consensus sepsis clusters via goal-directed subgroup identification in multi-omics study.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Machine learning identifies clusters of multimorbidity among decedents with inflammatory bowel disease.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- The ferroptosis-related gene MAFG screened by machine learning is associated with the diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Article
- Deep learning integration of chest computed tomography and plasma proteomics to identify novel aspects of severe COVID-19 pneumonia.Journal of intensive medicine · 2025Article
- A gene expression-based approach for the precision use of hydrocortisone in septic shock patients; a secondary analysis of the ADRENAL trial.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2025Article
- Integrated analysis of FANCE expression and its regulatory role in the immune microenvironment of oral squamous cell carcinoma.Oncology letters · 2025Article
- Machine learning tools for deciphering the regulatory logic of enhancers in health and disease.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
- Targeting Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 to Alleviate T Cell Exhaustion and Improve Sepsis Prognosis.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Sepsis subphenotypes: bridging the gaps in sepsis treatment strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Personalized machine learning-based prognostic model for ICU-acquired bloodstream infections.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based identification of leptin-associated biomarkers and prognostic prediction models in sepsis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Identifying septic shock subgroups to tailor fluid strategies through multi-omics integration.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Comprehensive analysis of sialylation-related genes and construct the prognostic model in sepsis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Identification of four mitochondria-related genes in sepsis based on RNA sequencing technology.BMC immunology · 2024Observational
- Machine learning reveals ferroptosis features and a novel ferroptosis classifier in patients with sepsis.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSepsis is a heterogenous syndrome and individualized management strategy is the key to successful treatment. Genome wide expression profiling has been utilized for identifying subclasses of sepsis, but the clinical utility of these subclasses was limited because of the classification instability, and the lack of a robust class prediction model with extensive external validation. The study aimed to develop a parsimonious class model for the prediction of class membership and validate the model for its prognostic and predictive capability in external datasets.
methodsThe Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and ArrayExpress databases were searched from inception to April 2020. Datasets containing whole blood gene expression profiling in adult sepsis patients were included. Autoencoder was used to extract representative features for k-means clustering. Genetic algorithms (GA) were employed to derive a parsimonious 5-gene class prediction model. The class model was then applied to external datasets (n = 780) to evaluate its prognostic and predictive performance.
findingsA total of 12 datasets involving 1613 patients were included. Two classes were identified in the discovery cohort (n = 685). Class 1 was characterized by immunosuppression with higher mortality than class 2 (21.8% [70/321] vs. 12.1% [44/364]; p < 0.01 for Chi-square test). A 5-gene class model (C14orf159, AKNA, PILRA, STOM and USP4) was developed with GA. In external validation cohorts, the 5-gene class model (AUC: 0.707; 95% CI: 0.664 - 0.750) performed better in predicting mortality than sepsis response signature (SRS) endotypes (AUC: 0.610; 95% CI: 0.521 - 0.700), and performed equivalently to the APACHE II score (AUC: 0.681; 95% CI: 0.595 - 0.767). In the dataset E-MTAB-7581, the use of hydrocortisone was associated with increased risk of mortality (OR: 3.15 [1.13, 8.82]; p = 0.029) in class 2. The effect was not statistically significant in class 1 (OR: 1.88 [0.70, 5.09]; p = 0.211).
interpretationOur study identified two classes of sepsis that showed different mortality rates and responses to hydrocortisone therapy. Class 1 was characterized by immunosuppression with higher mortality rate than class 2. We further developed a 5-gene class model to predict class membership.
fundingThe study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81,901,929).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.