ReviewDifferentiation; research in biological diversity
Anatomy of the mouse penis and internal prepuce.
Review in Differentiation; research in biological diversity. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Advances in the study of the correlation between balanoposthitis and skin microecology.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Emerging structural and pathological analyses on the erectile organ, corpus cavernous containing sinusoids.Reproductive medicine and biologyReview
- Developmental and functional roles of androgen and interactive signals for external genitalia and erectile tissues.Reproductive medicine and biologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This paper addresses a confusing issue of preputial anatomy of the mouse. The term "internal prepuce" was used in 2013 to describe a preputial structure integral to the mouse glans penis. Subsequently in 2015 the same term was applied by another group to describe entirely different morphology, generating confusion in the literature. Because it is inappropriate to use the same term to describe entirely different structures, we take this opportunity to provide further descriptive information on the internal prepuce of the mouse employing gross dissection, analysis of serial histologic section sets, three-dimensional reconstruction, scanning electron microscopy and immunohistochemistry. For this purpose, we review and illustrate the relevant literature and provide some additional new data using standard morphological techniques including immunohistochemistry. The mouse internal prepuce is integral to the glans penis and clearly is involved in sexual function in so far as it contains a major erectile body innervated by penile nerves. The development of the mouse internal prepuce is described for the first time and related to the development of the corpus cavernosum glandis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.