Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33180833›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Development and validation of a time and motion guide to assess the costs of prevention and control interventions for nosocomial infections: A Delphi method among experts.

Eric Tchouaket Nguemeleu, Sandra Boivin, Stephanie Robins, Drissa Sia, Kelley Kilpatrick, Sylvain Brousseau, Bruno Dubreuil, Catherine Larouche, Natasha Parisien

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Observational
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Eric Tchouaket NguemeleuUniversité du Québec en Outaouais, Department of Nursing Research, Saint-Jérôme, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4309-0478
Sandra BoivinCentre Intégré de Santé et de Services de Sociaux des Laurentides, Direction de la Santé Publique, Saint-Jérôme, Québec, Canada.
Stephanie RobinsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais, Department of Nursing Research, Saint-Jérôme, QC, Canada.
Drissa SiaUniversité du Québec en Outaouais, Department of Nursing Research, Saint-Jérôme, QC, Canada.
Kelley KilpatrickIngram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2137-6560
Sylvain BrousseauUniversité du Québec en Outaouais, Department of Nursing Research, Saint-Jérôme, QC, Canada.
Bruno DubreuilInstitut de Cardiologie, Montreal Heart Institute, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Catherine LaroucheCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay, Lac-Saint-Jean, Québec, Canada.
Natasha ParisienInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Québec, Canada.
Université du Québec en Outaouais · CACentre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux des Laurentides · CACentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean · CAInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec · CAMcGill University · CAMontreal Heart Institute · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNosocomial infections place a heavy burden on patients and healthcare providers and impact health care institutions financially. Reducing nosocomial infections requires an integrated program of prevention and control using key clinical best care practices. No instrument currently exists that measures these practices in terms of personnel time and material costs.

objectiveTo develop and validate an instrument that would measure nosocomial infection control and prevention best care practice costs, including estimates of human and material resources.

methodsAn evaluation of the literature identified four practices essential for the control of pathogens: hand hygiene, hygiene and sanitation, screening and additional precaution. To reflect time, materials and products used in these practices, our team developed a time and motion guide. Iterations of the guide were assessed in a Delphi technique; content validity was established using the content validity index and reliability was assessed using Kruskall Wallis one-way ANOVA of rank test.

resultsTwo rounds of Delphi review were required; 88% of invited experts completed the assessment. The final version of the guide contains eight dimensions: Identification [83 items]; Personnel [5 items]; Additional Precautions [1 item]; Hand Hygiene [2 items]; Personal Protective Equipment [14 items]; Screening [4 items]; Cleaning and Disinfection of Patient Care Equipment [33 items]; and Hygiene and Sanitation [24 items]. The content validity index obtained for all dimensions was acceptable (> 80%). Experts statistically agreed on six of the eight dimensions. DISCUSSION/

conclusionThis study developed and validated a new instrument based on expert opinion, the time and motion guide, for the systematic assessment of costs relating to the human and material resources used in nosocomial infection prevention and control. This guide will prove useful to measure the intensity of the application of prevention and control measures taken before, during and after outbreak periods or during pandemics such as COVID-19.

Indexed as

Time and Motion StudiesAlgorithmsCross InfectionDelphi TechniqueDisinfectionHand HygieneHumansInfection ControlMass ScreeningPersonal Protective EquipmentSanitation

Identifiers

PMID33180833
PMCPMC7660509
OpenAlexW3102400155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.