Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33180516›Full record

ArticleJournal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43)2021

The lump-versus-split dilemma in couple observational coding: A multisite analysis of rapid marital interaction coding system data.

Richard E Heyman, Amy K Otto, Maija Reblin, Alexandra K Wojda, Shu Xu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A day in the life: Couples' everyday communication and subsequent relationship outcomes.Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43) · 2024
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Richard E HeymanFamily Translational Research Group.ORCID 0000-0002-5365-0037
Amy K OttoDepartment of Health Outcomes and Behavior.ORCID 0000-0003-3712-6435
Maija ReblinDepartment of Health Outcomes and Behavior.ORCID 0000-0003-3108-465X
Alexandra K WojdaFamily Translational Research Group.ORCID 0000-0003-0769-1118
Shu XuSchool of Global Public Health.ORCID 0000-0001-6968-1674
Translational Research in Oncology · FR

Funding

Behavioral Oncology Education & Career DevelopmentT32CA090314 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI Vani N Simmons, SUSAN T VADAPARAMPIL · 2019 to 2026
$2.9M
Targeting Corrosive Couple Conflict and Parent-Child Coercion to Impact Health Behaviors and Regimen AdherenceUH2DE025980 · NIDCR · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI BEAUCHAINE, THEODORE PATRICK, HEYMAN, RICHARD ELIOT · 2015 to 2017
$1.8M
American Cancer SocietyNational Institutes of Health; National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial ResearchNCI NIH HHSNCI NIH HHS T32 CA090314NIDCR NIH HHS UH2 DE025980
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historically, observational couple communication researchers have oscillated between splitting behaviors into narrowly defined discrete codes and grouping behaviors into broader codes-sometimes within the same study. We label this the "lump-versus-split dilemma." Coding across a decade and 11 investigators were used to recommend the most meaningful number of codes to use when observing couples' conflict. We combined data from 14 studies that used the Rapid Marital Interaction Coding System (RMICS) to score communication behavior during different-sex couples' conflict interactions. In each study, couples completed at least one 10-min, video-recorded conflict discussion. Communication during these interactions was coded by trained research staff using RMICS; all codes were compiled into a single data set for descriptive analysis and exploratory factor analyses (EFAs). The final sample comprised

Indexed as

CommunicationInterpersonal RelationsResearch DesignAdultFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHostilityHumansMaleMarriageMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSocial Perception

Identifiers

PMID33180516
PMCPMC8113338
OpenAlexW3101631857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.