Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33180344›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2021

A patient and public involvement workshop using visual art and priority setting to provide patients with a voice to describe quality and safety concerns: Vitamin B12 deficiency and pernicious anaemia.

Natasha Tyler, Sally Giles, Gavin Daker-White, Beth Clare McManus, Maria Panagioti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Use of Arts-Based Methods to Enhance Patient Engagement in Health Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Review
  5. Vitamin BBMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. How Do Patients Receiving Prescribed BJournal of patient experience · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Natasha TylerNIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8257-1090
Sally GilesNIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Gavin Daker-WhiteNIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Beth Clare McManus
Maria PanagiotiNIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7153-5745

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) is recognized as important for improved quality in health service provision and research. Vitamin B12 deficiency is one area where PPIE has potential to benefit patients, as patients often report sub-optimal care due to diagnostic delay, insufficient treatment and poor relationships with health professionals.

objectiveIn an effort to engage an understudied patient population in health-care quality and safety discussions, and provide patients with an opportunity to have a voice, contribute to research priorities and express their current quality and safety concerns, we hosted a PPIE workshop.

methodsOne researcher (with lived experience) facilitated a one day workshop with 12 patients with varied demographics. The workshop had four components (a) one-to-one sessions with an artist, (b) quality and safety research/education priority setting, (c) comments on research proposals, and (d) development of a PPIE group for future research.

resultsAll elements of the workshop elicited a number of quality and safety priorities for the group. Priority setting highlighted issues with interpretation of test results, symptom-based treatment, self-medication and relationship with primary care health-care professionals. One of the major safety issues highlighted in the visual art element was feeling ignored, silenced or not listened too by health-care professionals. DISCUSSION: Visual art methods to express experiences of health, and research priority setting tasks achieved the aim of providing patients with an opportunity to have a voice and express concerns about health-care quality and safety issues. The addition of visual art allowed patients to articulate emotions and impacts on everyday life associated with quality and safety. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: A public contributor was involved in preparation of this manuscript. The event aimed to enable PPIE contribution in future research.

Indexed as

Anemia, PerniciousDelayed DiagnosisHumansPatient ParticipationPrimary Health CareResearch DesignB12 deficiencypatient and public involvementpatient experiencepatient safetypernicious anaemiaPPIprimary carepriority settingvisual art

Identifiers

PMID33180344
PMCPMC7879548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.