ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2021
Pharmacological treatment and inappropriate prescriptions for patients with erectile dysfunction.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Disproportionality analysis of drug-induced erectile dysfunction using FAERS database.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Pharmacological Management and Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions for Patients with Acne.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Erectile dysfunction is associated with old age, some morbidities and the use of certain medications. Objective To identify the treatments and drugs related to worsening sexual activity in patients with erectile dysfunction. Setting Patients diagnosed with erectile dysfunction during 2018. Methods This cross-sectional study of a population database identified all drug prescriptions of patients with erectile dysfunction during 2018. Main outcome measure The identification of other comorbidities and potentially inappropriate drugs that could worsen erectile dysfunction. Results A total of 2999 patients with erectile dysfunction (mean age 59.6 ± 12.1 years) were identified. A total of 88.2% received pharmacological treatment for erectile dysfunction, mainly tadalafil (70.5%). A total of 47.6% of all patients received at least one medication associated with worsening erectile dysfunction, especially hydrochlorothiazide (17.0%), metoprolol (7.9%) and sertraline (6.7%). Residing in Cali (OR 1.86; 95% CI 1.52-22.27) or Bucaramanga (OR 2.23; 95% CI 1.39-33.58), having 3 or more chronic comorbidities (OR 1.52; 95% CI 1.04-2.24) and presenting psychiatric (OR 5.5; 95% CI 3.70-8.17), cardiovascular (OR 3.48; 95% CI 2.79-4.33), genitourinary (OR 1.31; 95% CI 1.05-1.64) pathologies or chronic kidney failure (OR 1.84; 95% CI 1.18-2.21) elevated the probability of receiving these prescriptions. Conclusions The pharmacological treatment of erectile dysfunction was in accordance with the recommendations of clinical practice guidelines, but the high proportion of potentially inappropriate prescriptions makes it necessary to promote educational and pharmacovigilance strategies that improve the prescription habits of physicians involved in caring for this group of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.