Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33180152›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2022

Images of the unseen: extrapolating visual representations for abstract and concrete words in a data-driven computational model.

Fritz Günther, Marco Alessandro Petilli, Alessandra Vergallito, Marco Marelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Multimodal prior knowledge determines false memory formation.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Haptic Compensation in Blind People's Conceptual Representations.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fritz GüntherUniversity of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. fritz.guenther@uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9205-6786
Marco Alessandro PetilliUniversity of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Alessandra VergallitoUniversity of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Marco MarelliUniversity of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 392225719Fondazione Cariplo (IT) 2017-1633
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theories of grounded cognition assume that conceptual representations are grounded in sensorimotor experience. However, abstract concepts such as jealousy or childhood have no directly associated referents with which such sensorimotor experience can be made; therefore, the grounding of abstract concepts has long been a topic of debate. Here, we propose (a) that systematic relations exist between semantic representations learned from language on the one hand and perceptual experience on the other hand, (b) that these relations can be learned in a bottom-up fashion, and (c) that it is possible to extrapolate from this learning experience to predict expected perceptual representations for words even where direct experience is missing. To test this, we implement a data-driven computational model that is trained to map language-based representations (obtained from text corpora, representing language experience) onto vision-based representations (obtained from an image database, representing perceptual experience), and apply its mapping function onto language-based representations for abstract and concrete words outside the training set. In three experiments, we present participants with these words, accompanied by two images: the image predicted by the model and a random control image. Results show that participants' judgements were in line with model predictions even for the most abstract words. This preference was stronger for more concrete items and decreased for the more abstract ones. Taken together, our findings have substantial implications in support of the grounding of abstract words, suggesting that we can tap into our previous experience to create possible visual representation we don't have.

Indexed as

Concept FormationSemanticsChildCognitionHumansLanguageLearningAbstract conceptsAbstract wordsConcretenessDeep LearningDistributional SemanticsGrounded Cognition

Identifiers

PMID33180152
PMCPMC9674750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.