Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33180025›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020

Advanced Symptom Management System for Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (ASyMSmeso): Mixed Methods Study.

Roma Maguire, John Connaghan, Anne Arber, Naomi Klepacz, Kevin G Blyth, John McPhelim, Paul Murray, Hitasha Rupani, Anoop Chauhan, Peter Williams and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Pleural mesothelioma.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Roma MaguireDepartment of Computing and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7935-3447
John ConnaghanDepartment of Computing and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5558-7986
Anne ArberFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5930-811X
Naomi KlepaczFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7552-8000
Kevin G BlythGlasgow Pleural Disease Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2972-6641
John McPhelimUniversity Hospital Hairmyres, NHS Lanarkshire, East Kilbride, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6535-2766
Paul MurrayAshford and St Peter's NHS Trust, Surrey, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7818-8857
Hitasha RupaniPortsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0150-138X
Anoop ChauhanPortsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4044-6114
Peter WilliamsFaculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7885-0564
Laura McNaughtonGlasgow Pleural Disease Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2448-476X
Kirstie WoodsUniversity Hospital Monklands, NHS Lanarkshire, Airdrie, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2776-0993
Anne MoylanPortsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3569-1126
Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Surrey · GBNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde · GBNHS Lanarkshire · GBUniversity of Strathclyde · GBAshford and St Peter's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) have a life-limiting illness and short prognosis and experience many debilitating symptoms from early in the illness. Innovations such as remote symptom monitoring are needed to enable patients to maintain wellbeing and manage symptoms in a proactive and timely manner. The Advanced Symptom Management System (ASyMS) has been successfully used to monitor symptoms associated with cancer.

objectiveThis study aimed to determine the feasibility and acceptability of using an ASyMS adapted for use by patients with MPM, called ASyMSmeso, enabling the remote monitoring of symptoms using a smartphone.

methodsThis was a convergent mixed methods study using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at key time points over a period of 2-3 months with 18 patients. The Sheffield Profile for Assessment and Referral for Care (SPARC), Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) measure for eHealth, and Lung Cancer Symptom Scale-Mesothelioma (LCSS-Meso) were the PROMs used in the study. Patients were also asked to complete a daily symptom questionnaire on a smartphone throughout the study. At the end of the study, semistructured interviews with 11 health professionals, 8 patients, and 3 carers were conducted to collect their experience with using ASyMSmeso.

resultsEighteen patients with MPM agreed to participate in the study (33.3% response rate). The completion rates of study PROMs were high (97.2%-100%), and completion rates of the daily symptom questionnaire were also high, at 88.5%. There were no significant changes in quality of life, as measured by LCSS-Meso. There were statistically significant improvements in the SPARC psychological need domain (P=.049) and in the "Usefulness" domain of the TAM (P=.022). End-of-study interviews identified that both patients and clinicians found the system quick and easy to use. For patients, in particular, the system provided reassurance about symptom experience and the feeling of being listened to. The clinicians largely viewed the system as feasible and acceptable, and areas that were mentioned included the early management of symptoms and connectivity between patients and clinicians, leading to enhanced communication.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that remote monitoring and management of symptoms of people with MPM using a mobile phone are feasible and acceptable. The evidence supports future trials using remote symptom monitoring to support patients with MPM at home.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMesothelioma, MalignantMiddle AgedPrognosisQuality of LifeSurvival Analysiscancermalignant pleural mesotheliomamobile healthpatient reported outcome measurestelemedicine, symptom monitoring

Identifiers

PMID33180025
PMCPMC7691092
OpenAlexW3102433264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.