Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33179756›Full record

ReviewCell regeneration (London, England)2020

Protein quality control of cell stemness.

Pengze Yan, Jie Ren, Weiqi Zhang, Jing Qu, Guang-Hui Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell regeneration (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Recent insights into HSP70: proteostasis and beyond.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. WOX11: the founder of plant organ regeneration.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. The landscape of aging.Science China. Life sciences · 2022
    Review
  17. The roles of HSP40/DNAJ protein family in neurodegenerative diseases.Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pengze YanState Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
Jie RenUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
Weiqi ZhangUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China. zhangwq@big.ac.cn.
Jing QuUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China. qujing@ioz.ac.cn.
Guang-Hui LiuState Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China. ghliu@ioz.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9289-8177

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein quality control (PQC) systems play essential roles in the recognition, refolding and clearance of aberrant proteins, thus ensuring cellular protein homeostasis, or proteostasis. Especially, continued proliferation and differentiation of stem cells require a high rate of translation; therefore, accurate PQC systems are essential to maintain stem cell function. Growing evidence suggested crucial roles of PQC systems in regulating the stemness and differentiation of stem cells. This review focuses on current knowledge regarding the components of the proteostasis network in stem cells, and the importance of proteostasis in maintaining stem cell identity and regenerative functions. A complete understanding of this process might uncover potential applications in aging intervention and aging-related diseases.

Indexed as

AutophagyChaperonesProtein quality controlStem cellsStemnessUbiquitin-proteasome systemUnfolded protein response

Identifiers

PMID33179756
PMCPMC7658286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.