Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33179614›Full record

ReviewPathologica2021

The 2020 WHO Classification of Soft Tissue Tumours: news and perspectives.

Marta Sbaraglia, Elena Bellan, Angelo P Dei Tos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pathologica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 709 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
709citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

709 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Anthropometric factors, physical activity, and the risk of soft tissue sarcoma: a case-control study.European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Fat-Containing Soft Tissue Lesions of the Limbs and Body Wall-A Pictorial Essay.Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

649 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marta SbaragliaDepartment of Pathology, Azienda Ospedale Università Padova, Padova, Italy.
Elena BellanDepartment of Pathology, Azienda Ospedale Università Padova, Padova, Italy.
Angelo P Dei TosDepartment of Pathology, Azienda Ospedale Università Padova, Padova, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mesenchymal tumours represent one of the most challenging field of diagnostic pathology and refinement of classification schemes plays a key role in improving the quality of pathologic diagnosis and, as a consequence, of therapeutic options. The recent publication of the new WHO classification of Soft Tissue Tumours and Bone represents a major step toward improved standardization of diagnosis. Importantly, the 2020 WHO classification has been opened to expert clinicians that have further contributed to underline the key value of pathologic diagnosis as a rationale for proper treatment. Several relevant advances have been introduced. In the attempt to improve the prediction of clinical behaviour of solitary fibrous tumour, a risk assessment scheme has been implemented. NTRK-rearranged soft tissue tumours are now listed as an "emerging entity" also in consideration of the recent therapeutic developments in terms of NTRK inhibition. This decision has been source of a passionate debate regarding the definition of "tumour entity" as well as the consequences of a "pathology agnostic" approach to precision oncology. In consideration of their distinct clinicopathologic features, undifferentiated round cell sarcomas are now kept separate from Ewing sarcoma and subclassified, according to the underlying gene rearrangements, into three main subgroups (CIC, BCLR and not ETS fused sarcomas) Importantly, In order to avoid potential confusion, tumour entities such as gastrointestinal stroma tumours are addressed homogenously across the different WHO fascicles. Pathologic diagnosis represents the integration of morphologic, immunohistochemical and molecular characteristics and is a key element of clinical decision making. The WHO classification is as a key instrument to promote multidisciplinarity, stimulating pathologists, geneticists and clinicians to join efforts aimed to translate novel pathologic findings into more effective treatments.

Indexed as

SarcomaSarcoma, EwingSoft Tissue NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorHumansPrecision MedicineWorld Health OrganizationBiomarkers, Tumormolecular geneticsmorphologynew entitysoft tissue sarcomaWHO classification

Identifiers

PMID33179614
PMCPMC8167394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.