Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33179448›Full record

ArticleESC heart failure2021

Differences between familial and sporadic dilated cardiomyopathy: ESC EORP Cardiomyopathy & Myocarditis registry.

Folkert W Asselbergs, Arjan Sammani, Perry Elliott, Juan R Gimeno, Luigi Tavazzi, Michael Tendera, Juan Pablo Kaski, Aldo P Maggioni, Pawel P Rubis, Ruxandra Jurcut and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESC heart failure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. What Do We Know about Peripartum Cardiomyopathy? Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Spotlight on the 2022 ESC guideline management of ventricular arrhythmias and prevention of sudden cardiac death: 10 novel key aspects.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS)/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS) Expert Consensus Statement on the state of genetic testing for cardiac diseases.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Folkert W AsselbergsDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584CX, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1692-8669
Arjan SammaniDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584CX, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5557-9342
Perry ElliottBarts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, University College London and Inherited Cardiac Diseases Unit, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3383-3984
Juan R GimenoCardiac Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5818-1754
Luigi TavazziGVM Care & Research, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy.
Michael TenderaDepartment of Cardiology and Structural Heart Diseases, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Juan Pablo KaskiCentre for Inherited Cardiovascular Diseases, Great Ormond Street Hospital, UK and University College London Institute of Cardiovascular Science, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0014-9927
Aldo P MaggioniGVM Care & Research, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2764-6779
Pawel P RubisDepartment of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Jagiellonian University Medical College, John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6979-3411
Ruxandra JurcutDepartment of Cardiology, Emergency Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases C.C. Iliescu, Bucharest, Romania.
Tiina HeliöDepartment of Cardiology, Helsinki University Central Hospital Meilahti, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-9640-9040
Leonardo CalòU.O. Cardiologia, Policlinico Casilino, Rome, Italy.
Gianfranco SinagraCardiovascular Department, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata Giuliano Isontina, Trieste, Italy.
Marija ZdravkovicClinical Hospital Center Bezanijska kosa, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Beograd, Serbia.
Iacopo OlivottoCardiomyopathy Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Aušra KavoliūnienėDepartment of Cardiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Cécile LarocheEUR Observational Research Programme, European Society of Cardiology, Sophia-Antipolis, France.
Alida L P CaforioDivision of Cardiology, Department of Cardiological Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Philippe CharronAPHP, Centre de Référence des Maladies Cardiaques Héréditaires, ICAN, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1782-1118
Cardiomyopathy & Myocarditis Registry Investigators Group

Funding

British Heart FoundationDepartment of HealthMedical Research Council MR/T024062/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsDilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a complex disease where genetics interplay with extrinsic factors. This study aims to compare the phenotype, management, and outcome of familial DCM (FDCM) and non-familial (sporadic) DCM (SDCM) across Europe. METHODS AND

resultsPatients with DCM that were enrolled in the prospective ESC EORP Cardiomyopathy & Myocarditis Registry were included. Baseline characteristics, genetic testing, genetic yield, and outcome were analysed comparing FDCM and SDCM; 1260 adult patients were studied (238 FDCM, 707 SDCM, and 315 not disclosed). Patients with FDCM were younger (P < 0.01), had less severe disease phenotype at presentation (P < 0.02), more favourable baseline cardiovascular risk profiles (P ≤ 0.007), and less medication use (P ≤ 0.042). Outcome at 1 year was similar and predicted by NYHA class (HR 0.45; 95% CI [0.25-0.81]) and LVEF per % decrease (HR 1.05; 95% CI [1.02-1.08]. Throughout Europe, patients with FDCM received more genetic testing (47% vs. 8%, P < 0.01) and had higher genetic yield (55% vs. 22%, P < 0.01).

conclusionsWe observed that FDCM and SDCM have significant differences at baseline but similar short-term prognosis. Whether modification of associated cardiovascular risk factors provide opportunities for treatment remains to be investigated. Our results also show a prevalent role of genetics in FDCM and a non-marginal yield in SDCM although genetic testing is largely neglected in SDCM. Limited genetic testing and heterogeneity in panels provides a scaffold for improvement of guideline adherence.

Indexed as

CardiomyopathiesCardiomyopathy, DilatedMyocarditisAdultEuropeHumansProspective StudiesRegistriesDilated cardiomyopathyEuropeFamilialGeneticPrognosisSporadic

Identifiers

PMID33179448
PMCPMC7835585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.