Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33179378›Full record

ReviewThe oncologist2021

2020 Innovation-Based Optimism for Lung Cancer Outcomes.

Erin L Schenk, Tejas Patil, Jose Pacheco, Paul A Bunn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Landscape and clinical implications of EGFR exon 20 insertions in non-small cell lung cancer patients.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Persistent Effect of Redlining on Survival from Screenable Cancers in Washington State, 2000-2018.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Siglec 15 as a biomarker or a druggable molecule for non-small cell lung cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. The transcription activity ofTranslational cancer research · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Study of the Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 on International Lung Cancer Clinical Trials.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Erin L SchenkDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Tejas PatilDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Jose PachecoDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Paul A BunnDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0518-5959

Funding

Paul Calabresis Award in Clinical Oncology ResearchK12CA086913 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI VIRGINIA F. BORGES, Jill E Slansky · 2000 to 2026
$17.8M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA086913
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in both males and females in the U.S. and worldwide. Owing to advances in prevention, screening/early detection, and therapy, lung cancer mortality rates are decreasing and survival rates are increasing. These innovations are based on scientific discoveries in imaging, diagnostics, genomics, molecular therapy, and immunotherapy. Outcomes have improved in all histologies and stages. This review provides information on the clinical implications of these innovations that are practical for the practicing physicians, especially oncologists of all specialities who diagnose and treat patients with lung cancer. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Lung cancer survival rates have improved because of new prevention, screening, and therapy methods. This work provides a review of current standards for each of these areas, including targeted and immunotherapies. Treatment recommendations are provided for all stages of lung cancer.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsFemaleGenomicsHumansImmunotherapyMaleMass ScreeningSurvival RateDiagnosis and therapyLung cancerPreventionScreening

Identifiers

PMID33179378
PMCPMC7930417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.