Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33179265›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2021

How the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic is impacting sexual and reproductive health and rights and response: Results from a global survey of providers, researchers, and policy-makers.

Margit Endler, Taghreed Al-Haidari, Chiara Benedetto, Sameena Chowdhury, Jan Christilaw, Faysal El Kak, Diana Galimberti, Claudia Garcia-Moreno, Miguel Gutierrez, Shaimaa Ibrahim and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. The use of telemedicine services for medical abortion.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Margit EndlerDepartment of Women and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0164-6455
Taghreed Al-HaidariScientific Affairs Unit, Al Kindy College of Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.
Chiara BenedettoDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Sant´Anna University Hospital, Torino, Italy.
Sameena ChowdhuryObstetrical and Gynecological Society of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Jan ChristilawFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Faysal El KakAmerican University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon, and International Federation of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, London, UK.
Diana GalimbertiUniversity of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Claudia Garcia-MorenoWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Miguel GutierrezInstituto de Salud Popular (INSAP), Lima, Peru.
Shaimaa IbrahimUNICEF Iraq, Baghdad, Iraq.
Shantha KumariYashoda Hospital, Hyderabad, India.
Colleen McNicholasPlanned Parenthood, St Louis, MO, USA.
Desirée Mostajo FloresThe Bolivian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Santa Cruz de la Sierra La Paz, Bolivia.
John MugandaThe Rwanda Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Kigali, Rwanda.
Atziri Ramirez-NegrinUrogynecology Department, Hospital Dr Manuel Gea Gonzalez, Mexico City, Mexico.
Hemantha SenanayakeUniversity of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Rubina SohailServices Institute of Medical Sciences/Services Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.
Marleen TemmermanAga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Kristina Gemzell-DanielssonDepartment of Women and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6516-1444

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe aimed to give a global overview of trends in access to sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and what is being done to mitigate its impact. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe performed a descriptive analysis and content analysis based on an online survey among clinicians, researchers, and organizations. Our data were extracted from multiple-choice questions on access to SRHR services and risk of SRHR violations, and written responses to open-ended questions on threats to access and required response.

resultsThe survey was answered by 51 people representing 29 countries. Eighty-six percent reported that access to contraceptive services was less or much less because of COVID-19, corresponding figures for surgical and medical abortion were 62% and 46%. The increased risk of gender-based and sexual violence was assessed as moderate or severe by 79%. Among countries with mildly restrictive abortion policies, 69% had implemented changes to facilitate access to abortion during the pandemic, compared with none among countries with severe restrictions (P < .001), 87.5% compared with 46% had implemented changes to facilitate access to contraception (P = .023). The content analysis showed that (a) prioritizations in health service delivery at the expense of SRHR, (b) lack of political will, (c) the detrimental effect of lockdown, and (d) the suspension of sexual education, were threats to SRHR access (theme 1). Requirements to mitigate these threats (theme 2) were (a) political will and support of universal access to SRH services, (b) the sensitization of providers, (c) free public transport, and (d) physical protective equipment. A contrasting third theme was the state of exception of the COVID-19 pandemic as a window of opportunity to push forward women's health and rights.

conclusionsMany countries have seen decreased access to and increased violations of SRHR during the COVID-19 pandemic. Countries with severe restrictions on abortion seem less likely to have implemented changes to SRHR delivery to mitigate this impact. Political will to support the advancement of SRHR is often lacking, which is fundamental to ensuring both continued access and, in a minority of cases, the solidification of gains made to SRHR during the pandemic.

Indexed as

Global HealthPandemicsReproductive HealthAdolescentAdultCOVID-19FemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMiddle AgedPregnancySARS-CoV-2SexismSurveys and Questionnairesabortionaccesscontraceptivescoronavirus disease 2019gender-based violencesexual and reproductive health and rights

Identifiers

PMID33179265
PMCPMC8247356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.