Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33179193›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2021

Twenty-four-month results of intravitreal aflibercept for macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion.

Yoshihito Sakanishi, Koichi Yasuda, Syu Morita, Keitaro Mashimo, Kazunori Tamaki, Toshiro Sakuma, Nobuyuki Ebihara

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Classification of good visual acuity over time in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion with macular edema using support vector machine.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yoshihito SakanishiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, 2-1-1 Tomioka, Urayasu, Japan. ysakani@juntendo.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2863-0165
Koichi YasudaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, 2-1-1 Tomioka, Urayasu, Japan.
Syu MoritaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, 2-1-1 Tomioka, Urayasu, Japan.
Keitaro MashimoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, 2-1-1 Tomioka, Urayasu, Japan.
Kazunori TamakiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, 2-1-1 Tomioka, Urayasu, Japan.
Toshiro SakumaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, 2-1-1 Tomioka, Urayasu, Japan.
Nobuyuki EbiharaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, 2-1-1 Tomioka, Urayasu, Japan.
Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate 24-month results of intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) for macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO-ME). STUDY

designRetrospective study.

methodsSubjects were treatment-naïve BRVO-ME patients at the Ophthalmology Department of Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital from November 2015 to March 2017 who received IVA treatment for 24 months. After the first injection, reinjection was performed as needed when ME had recurred or was prolonged beyond 300 μm. Data included changes in best corrected visual acuity and central foveal thickness, total number of injections, and the case background factors that required reinjection after 12 months. ME remission was defined as patients without additional injections for 6 months.

resultsForty eyes of 40 patients (64.5 ± 11.5 years), 21 men and 19 women, were included. Average best corrected visual acuity and central foveal thickness at baseline were logMAR 0.42 ± 0.21, 601.4 ± 181.3 μm, logMAR 0.08 ± 0.25, 214.6 ± 62.7 μm at 12 months, logMAR 0.02 ± 0.16, 216.6 ± 97.8 μm at 24 months, all significantly improved from baseline. The average number of injections was 2.2 ± 1.0 times in the first year and 0.4 ± 0.8 times in the second year. The rate of ME remission was 60.0% at 12 months and 87.5% at 24 months. Period between onset and injections was significantly associated with reinjection after 12 months (p =.030).

conclusionsIVA was effective over 24 months for ME due to BRVO in many cases. Early injection treatment may reduce the need for later injections.

Indexed as

Macular EdemaRetinal Vein OcclusionAngiogenesis InhibitorsFemaleFluorescein AngiographyHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMaleReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsRetrospective StudiesTomography, Optical CoherenceTreatment OutcomeVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVisual AcuityafliberceptAngiogenesis InhibitorsReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor ABRVOIVAMacular edema

Identifiers

PMID33179193
OpenAlexW3103430296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.