Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33179170›Full record

ReviewCurrent environmental health reports2020

Power Outages and Community Health: a Narrative Review.

Joan A Casey, Mihoka Fukurai, Diana Hernández, Satchit Balsari, Mathew V Kiang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current environmental health reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Emergency Preparedness in Older Adults With and Without COPD During Power Outages and Natural Disasters.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Assessing the Sensitivities of Input-Output Methods for Natural Hazard-Induced Power Outage Macroeconomic Impacts.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joan A CaseyDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA. jac2250@cumc.columbia.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9809-4695
Mihoka FukuraiDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Diana HernándezDepartment of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Satchit BalsariDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Mathew V KiangFXB Center for Health and Human Rights, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

True Metal fac coreP30ES009089 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Steven N. Chillrud · 1998 to 2026
$44.7M
The Impact of Unconventional Natural Gas Development on Maternal, Perinatal, and Childhood Health: an Electronic Health Record ApproachR00ES027023 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CASEY, JOAN A · 2019 to 2021
$747k
Reducing racial disparities in the treatment of opioid use disorder using machine learning-based causal analysisK99DA051534 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KIANG, MATHEW VINHHOA · 2020 to 2021
$359k
NIDA NIH HHS K99 DA051534NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES009089NIEHS NIH HHS R00 ES027023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewPower outages, a common and underappreciated consequence of natural disasters, are increasing in number and severity due to climate change and aging electricity grids. This narrative review synthesizes the literature on power outages and health in communities. RECENT

findingsWe searched Google Scholar and PubMed for English language studies with titles or abstracts containing "power outage" or "blackout." We limited papers to those that explicitly mentioned power outages or blackouts as the exposure of interest for health outcomes among individuals living in the community. We also used the reference list of these studies to identify additional studies. The final sample included 50 articles published between 2004 and 2020, with 17 (34%) appearing between 2016 and 2020. Exposure assessment remains basic and inconsistent, with 43 (86%) of studies evaluating single, large-scale power outages. Few studies used spatial and temporal control groups to assess changes in health outcomes attributable to power outages. Recent research linked data from electricity providers on power outages in space and time and included factors such as number of customers affected and duration to estimate exposure. The existing literature suggests that power outages have important health consequences ranging from carbon monoxide poisoning, temperature-related illness, gastrointestinal illness, and mortality to all-cause, cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal disease hospitalizations, especially for individuals relying on electricity-dependent medical equipment. Nonetheless the studies are limited, and more work is needed to better define and capture the relevant exposures and outcomes. Studies should consider modifying factors such as socioeconomic and other vulnerabilities as well as how community resiliency can minimize the adverse impacts of widespread major power outages.

Indexed as

Public HealthElectricityElectric Power SuppliesHumansNatural DisastersRisk FactorsBlackoutCarbon monoxide poisoningDurable medical equipmentEnergy insecurityNatural disastersPower outage

Identifiers

PMID33179170
PMCPMC7749027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.