Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33179129›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2021

The Haleem-Botchu classification: a novel CT-based classification for lumbar foraminal stenosis.

S Haleem, M Malik, V Guduri, C Azzopardi, S James, R Botchu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Presentation, Diagnosis, and Management of Lower Back Pain Associated with Spinal Stenosis: A Narrative Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. What does the orthopaedic surgeon want in the radiology report?Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Letter to the Editor concerning "The Haleem-Botchu classification: a novel CT-based classification for lumbar foraminal stenosis" by Haleem S et al. [Eur Spine J (2020): DOI 10.1007/s00586-020-06656-5].European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
    Article
  13. Answer to the Letter to the Editor of Yin Mengchen et al. concerning "The Haleem-Botchu classification: a novel CT-based classification for lumbar foraminal stenosis" by Haleem S et al. [Eur Spine J (2020): DOI 10.1007/s00586-020-06656-5].European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

S HaleemRoyal Orthopaedic Hospital, The Woodlands, Bristol Road South, Birmingham, B31 2AP, UK. shahnawaz.haleem@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2678-9428
M MalikDivision of Medical Education, University of Brighton, Brighton, UK.
V GuduriRoyal Orthopaedic Hospital, The Woodlands, Bristol Road South, Birmingham, B31 2AP, UK.
C AzzopardiRoyal Orthopaedic Hospital, The Woodlands, Bristol Road South, Birmingham, B31 2AP, UK.
S JamesRoyal Orthopaedic Hospital, The Woodlands, Bristol Road South, Birmingham, B31 2AP, UK.
R BotchuRoyal Orthopaedic Hospital, The Woodlands, Bristol Road South, Birmingham, B31 2AP, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7998-2980

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNo clinical CT-based classification system is currently in use for lumbar foraminal stenosis. MRI scanners are not easily available, are expensive and may be contraindicated in an increasing number of patients. This study aimed to propose and evaluate the reproducibility of a novel CT-based classification for lumbar foraminal stenosis. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe grading was developed as four grades: normal foramen-Grade 0, anteroposterior (AP)/superoinferior (SI) (single plane) fat compression-Grade 1, both AP/SI compression (two planes) without distortion of nerve root-Grade 2 and Grade 2 with distortion of nerve root-Grade 3. A total of 800 lumbar foramen of a cohort of 100 random patients over the age of 60 who had undergone both CT and MRI scans were reviewed by two radiologists independently to assess agreement of the novel CT classification against the MRI-based grading system of Lee et al. Interobserver(n = 400) and intraobserver agreement(n = 160) was also evaluated. Agreement analysis was performed using the weighted kappa statistic.

resultsA total of 100 patients (M:F = 45:55) with a mean age of 68.5 years (range 60-83 years were included in the study. The duration between CT and MRI scans was 98 days (range 0-540, SD-108). There was good correlation between CT and MRI with kappa scores (k = 0.81) and intraobserver kappa of 0.89 and 0.98 for the two readers.

conclusionThe novel CT-based classification correlates well with the MRI grading system and can safely and accurately replace it where required.

Indexed as

Spinal StenosisAgedAged, 80 and overConstriction, PathologicHumansLumbar VertebraeLumbosacral RegionMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsTomography, X-Ray ComputedComputed tomographyInterobserver agreementIntraobserver agreementLumbar foraminal stenosisMagnetic resonance imagingNovel classification system

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.