Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33179022›Full record

ArticleAlcohol and alcoholism (Oxford, Oxfordshire)2021

The Frequency and Content of Discussions About Alcohol Use in Primary Care and Application of the Chief Medical Officer's Low-Risk Drinking Guidelines: A Cross-Sectional Survey of General Practitioners and Practice Nurses in the UK.

Jack M Birch, Nathan Critchlow, Lynn Calman, Robert Petty, Gillian Rosenberg, Harriet Rumgay, Jyotsna Vohra

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford, Oxfordshire), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jack M BirchMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical, Medicine, Box 285 Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6292-1647
Nathan CritchlowCancer Policy Research Centre, Cancer Research UK, 2 Redman Place, London, EC20 1JQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9145-8874
Lynn CalmanMacmillan Survivorship Research Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Robert PettyCancer Policy Research Centre, Cancer Research UK, 2 Redman Place, London, EC20 1JQ, UK.
Gillian RosenbergCancer Policy Research Centre, Cancer Research UK, 2 Redman Place, London, EC20 1JQ, UK.
Harriet RumgayCancer Intelligence, Cancer Research UK, 2 Redman Place, London, EC20 1JQ, UK.
Jyotsna VohraCancer Policy Research Centre, Cancer Research UK, 2 Redman Place, London, EC20 1JQ, UK.
Cancer Research UK · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Southampton · GBUniversity of Stirling · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12015/4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo examine how often general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses (PNs) working in primary care discuss alcohol with patients, what factors prompt discussions, how they approach patient discussions and whether the Chief Medical Officers' (CMO) revised low-risk drinking guidelines are appropriately advised.

methodsCross-sectional survey with GPs and PNs working in primary care in the UK, conducted January-March 2017 (n = 2020). A vignette exercise examined what factors would prompt a discussion about alcohol, whether they would discuss before or after a patient reported exceeded the revised CMO guidelines (14 units per week) and whether the CMO drinking guidelines were appropriately advised. For all patients, participants were asked how often they discussed alcohol and how they approached the discussion (e.g. used screening tool).

resultsThe most common prompts to discuss alcohol in the vignette exercise were physical cues (44.7% of participants) or alcohol-related symptoms (23.8%). Most practitioners (70.1%) said they would wait until a patient was exceeding CMO guidelines before instigating discussion. Two-fifths (38.1%) appropriately advised the CMO guidelines in the vignette exercise, with PNs less likely to do so than GPs (odds ratio [OR] = 0.77, P = 0.03). Less than half (44.7%) reportedly asked about alcohol always/often with all patients, with PNs more likely to ask always/often than GPs (OR = 2.22, P < 0.001). Almost three-quarters said they would enquire by asking about units (70.3%), compared to using screening tools.

conclusionFurther research is required to identify mechanisms to increase the frequency of discussions about alcohol and appropriate recommendation of the CMO drinking guidelines to patients.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingGuideline AdherenceNurse-Patient RelationsPhysician-Patient RelationsPrimary Health CareAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Nurses'Practice Patterns, Physicians'Surveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID33179022
PMCPMC7613882
OpenAlexW3092721835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.