ArticleAME case reports2020
Long-term clinical and radiological follow-up after anterior endoscopic cervical discectomy: a case report.
Article in AME case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy for cervical disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2022Pooled it
- Article
- Clinical study on the efficacy and safety of percutaneous endoscopic anterior cervical discectomy in the treatment of cervical disc herniation.International orthopaedics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anterior endoscopic cervical discectomy (AECD) using laser and micro forceps for cervical intervertebral disc herniation has been considered as an effective treatment modality in selected cases. However, several spine surgeons are concerned about the adverse outcomes of discectomy without fusion, such as postoperative instability, disc space narrowing, and segmental kyphosis. We report two cases of AECD that was performed 19 and 21 years ago. First case was a 44-year-old female with C56 cervical soft disc rupture and second case was a 42-year-old male with C67 cervical soft disc rupture. These patients suffered from cervical intervertebral disc herniation and underwent AECD. The surgical method followed the general AECD method that removed selectively-ruptured particle only. In both cases, the symptoms improved after AECD, and these patients did not experience any problems until recently. Good clinical results have been shown over the long-term, as seen in the two cases described here. In the radiological evaluation, it was confirmed that the postoperative level was stable and disc height was preserved. Furthermore, sagittal alignment and segmental motion of the cervical vertebra were both maintained. In these two cases, disc height was insignificantly different before and after surgery over a long period. Thus, AECD provides good results, even in long-term follow-up, without acceleration of disc degeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.