Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33178928›Full record

ReviewBJR open2019

Percutaneous MR-guided prostate cancer cryoablation technical updates and literature review.

Pierre de Marini, Roberto Luigi Cazzato, Julien Garnon, Behnam Shaygi, Guillaume Koch, Pierre Auloge, Thibault Tricard, Hervé Lang, Afshin Gangi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJR open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Current Status of Cryoablation in Prostate Cancer Management.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. State-of-the-art Prostate Imaging.Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pierre de MariniDepartment of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l'Hôpital, Strasbourg Cedex, France.
Roberto Luigi CazzatoDepartment of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l'Hôpital, Strasbourg Cedex, France.
Julien GarnonDepartment of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l'Hôpital, Strasbourg Cedex, France.
Behnam ShaygiDepartment of Radiology, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK.
Guillaume KochDepartment of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l'Hôpital, Strasbourg Cedex, France.
Pierre AulogeDepartment of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l'Hôpital, Strasbourg Cedex, France.
Thibault TricardDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l'Hôpital, Strasbourg Cedex, France.
Hervé LangDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l'Hôpital, Strasbourg Cedex, France.
Afshin GangiDepartment of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l'Hôpital, Strasbourg Cedex, France.
Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg · FRKing's College Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignant tumor in males. The benefits in terms of overall reduction in specific mortality due to the widespread use of Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) screening and the advancements in the curative treatments (radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy) appear to have reached a plateau. There remains, however, the questions of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of such patients. Currently, the main challenge in the treatment of patients with clinically organ-confined PCa is to offer an oncologically efficient treatment with as little morbidity as possible. Amongst the arising novel curative techniques for PCa, cryoablation (CA) is the most established one, which is also included in the NICE and AUA guidelines. CA is commonly performed under ultrasound guidance with the inherent limitations associated with this technique. The recent advancements in MRI have significantly improved the accuracy of detecting and characterizing a clinically significant PCa. This, alongside the development of wide bore interventional MR scanners, has opened the pathway for in bore PCa treatment. Under MRI guidance, PCa CA can be used either as a standard whole gland treatment or as a tumor targeted one. With MR-fluoroscopy, needle guidance capability, multiplanar and real-time visualization of the iceball, MRI eliminates the inherent limitations of ultrasound guidance and can potentially lead to a lower rate of local complications. The aim of this review article is to provide an overview about PCa CA with a more specific insight on MR guided PCa CA; the limitations, challenges and applications of this novel technique will be discussed.

Identifiers

PMID33178928
PMCPMC7592492
OpenAlexW2950970231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.