ArticleCureus2020
Waardenburg Syndrome Type-II in Twin Siblings: An Unusual Audio-Pigmentary Disorder.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of a de novo, Novel Pathogenic Variant in the Splice Region of theMolecular syndromology · 2023Article
- Waardenburg Syndrome in a Family.International journal of trichologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Waardenburg syndrome (WS) is an interesting inherited audio-pigmentary disorder. The syndrome shows no gender, racial, or ethnic predilection. This unique disorder is characterized by pigmentary abnormalities, deafness, and neural crest-derived tissue defect. WS can be recognized by some specific clinical features that appear after birth; not all affected individuals possess all the clinical features. It has four clinical sub types based on the mutant gene and characteristic morphology. These morphological features are broad nasal root, white forelock, the difference in the colour of eyes, congenital leukoderma, and sensorineural deafness. We report an interesting case of WS in twin boys who fulfill the criteria of WS-II. Our cases have four major criteria (white forelock, heterochromia, sensorineural hearing loss, first degree relative with WS), and 1 minor criterion to establish the diagnosis of WS-II. Most clinical features of WS-II except sensorineural deafness are benign and do not need any intervention but severe deafness can be a serious problem. The current report is unique and is a rare case of WS in twin infants. We present this case for its rarity, relative paucity of literature, and also to emphasize the clinical presentation of this extremely rare disease in twins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.