Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33178434›Full record

ArticleHealth information science and systems2020

Fusion of whole and part features for the classification of histopathological image of breast tissue.

Chiranjibi Sitaula, Sunil Aryal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health information science and systems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chiranjibi SitaulaSchool of Information Technology, Deakin University, 75 Pigdons Rd, Waurn Ponds, VIC 3216 Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4564-2985
Sunil AryalSchool of Information Technology, Deakin University, 75 Pigdons Rd, Waurn Ponds, VIC 3216 Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNowadays Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) models, particularly those based on deep learning, have been widely used to analyze histopathological images in breast cancer diagnosis. However, due to the limited availability of such images, it is always tedious to train deep learning models that require a huge amount of training data. In this paper, we propose a new deep learning-based CAD framework that can work with less amount of training data.

methodsWe use pre-trained models to extract image features that can then be used with any classifier. Our proposed features are extracted by the fusion of two different types of features (foreground and background) at two levels (whole-level and part-level). Foreground and background feature to capture information about different structures and their layout in microscopic images of breast tissues. Similarly, part-level and whole-level features capture are useful in detecting interesting regions scattered in high-resolution histopathological images at local and whole image levels. At each level, we use VGG16 models pre-trained on ImageNet and Places datasets to extract foreground and background features, respectively. All features are extracted from mid-level pooling layers of such models.

resultsWe show that proposed fused features with a Support Vector Classifier (SVM) produce better classification accuracy than recent methods on BACH dataset and our approach is orders of magnitude faster than the best performing recent method (EMS-Net).

conclusionWe believe that our method would be another alternative in the diagnosis of breast cancer because of performance and prediction time.

Indexed as

Breast cancerComputer-aided diagnosisDeep learningHistologyHistopathological imagesImage classification

Identifiers

PMID33178434
PMCPMC7642126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.