Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33178404›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of psychotraumatology2017

Interdisciplinary approaches to understand traumatic stress as a public health problem.

Paul Frewen, Christian Schmahl, Miranda Olff

Open access · goldAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of psychotraumatology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. To share or not to share - 10 years ofEuropean journal of psychotraumatology · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Improving the mental health system for trauma victims in France.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2019
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Paul FrewenDepartment of Psychiatry, Western University, London, Canada.
Christian SchmahlDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim, Germany.
Miranda OlffAcademic Medical Center at the University of Amsterdam, and Arq Psychotrauma Expert Group, The Netherlands.
Central Institute of Mental Health · DEUniversity of Amsterdam · NLWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In November 2016 researchers, clinicians, and student experts gathered in Dallas, Texas, USA for the annual meeting of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies (ISTSS). From the description of the meeting theme forward it was acknowledged that interdisciplinary approaches will be required to fully understand traumatic stress as a public health problem, including epidemiology, biostatistics and health services research. Further, it was recognized that knowledge translation would be of critical importance if we were to increase public awareness of - and destigmatize - posttraumatic biopsychosocial problems, including posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Moreover, we recognized innovative technologies as potentially usefully applied to public health strategies, including media and internet usage might aid knowledge translation and have a direct impact on help-seeking and trauma-informed care. The present special issue of the journal brings a collection of papers from some of the most impactful and innovative ideas that were presented in Dallas.

Indexed as

innovative technologiesposttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)public healthtrauma

Identifiers

PMID33178404
PMCPMC7593874
OpenAlexW2791305341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.