Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33178308›Full record

ReviewEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2020

Acupotomy Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Jigao Sun, Yan Zhao, Ruizheng Zhu, Qianglong Chen, Mengge Song, Zhipeng Xue, Rongtian Wang, Weiheng Chen

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jigao SunThe Third Affiliated Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8994-8559
Yan ZhaoWangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4610-5030
Ruizheng ZhuThe Third Affiliated Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8921-5363
Qianglong ChenGuizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4892-0725
Mengge SongWangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7353-9099
Zhipeng XueThe Third Affiliated Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5227-532X
Rongtian WangThe Third Affiliated Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9346-1660
Weiheng ChenThe Third Affiliated Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0831-1201
Beijing University of Chinese Medicine · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

methodsWe performed a comprehensive search on PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and four Chinese databases for articles published prior to June 2020. We included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that used acupotomy therapy as the major intervention in adults with knee OA, were published in either Chinese and English, included more than 20 subjects in each group, and included pain and function in the outcome measures. Knee OA was defined by the American College of Rheumatology or Chinese Orthopedic Association criteria in all studies. We extracted the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain score, the total effectiveness rate, the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) activities of daily living score, and Lysholm's score. We calculated the mean difference (MD) or risk ratio (RR) for all relevant outcomes. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models when appropriate.

resultsWe identified 1317 potentially relevant studies, thirty-two of which met the eligibility criteria and were conducted in China between 2007 and 2020. A total of 3021 knee OA patients (62.96% female, median age: 57 years, and median disease duration: 33 months) were included. The treatment duration ranged from 1 week to 5 weeks (median: 3 weeks). The typical acupotomy treatment involved releasing soft tissue adhesions and was performed once a week for 1-5 weeks until the pain was relieved. The control group treatments included acupuncture (8 studies), electroacupuncture (10 studies), sodium hyaluronate (8 studies), radiofrequency electrotherapy (1 study), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs, 5 studies). The results from the meta-analysis showed that acupotomy led to superior improvements in the VAS pain score (MD = -1.11; 95% confidence interval (CI), -1.51 to -0.71;

conclusionChinese acupotomy therapy may relieve pain and improve function in patients with knee OA. Furthermore, rigorously designed and well-controlled RCTs are warranted.

Identifiers

PMID33178308
PMCPMC7648689
OpenAlexW3095467968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.