Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33178275›Full record

ArticleJournal of oncology2020

Association of Tumor Size with Risk of Lymph Node Metastasis in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Population-Based Study.

Yunlai Zhi, Xiao Li, Feng Qi, Xin Hu, Wenbo Xu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yunlai ZhiDepartment of Urology, Lianyungang Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University & The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang 222002, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9847-281X
Xiao LiDepartment of Urologic Surgery, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research & Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210009, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9358-1136
Feng QiDepartment of Urologic Surgery, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research & Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210009, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1061-7058
Xin HuFirst Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0124-6032
Wenbo XuDepartment of Urology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450008, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3994-6077
Jiangsu Cancer Hospital · CNFifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CNNanjing Medical University · CNThe First People’s Hospital of Lianyungang · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this article was to explore the association of tumor size with lymph node metastases (LNM) risk in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) database, patients diagnosed with ccRCC from 1988 to 2015 were included in this study. For each patient, personal characteristics, clinicopathological data, and survival outcomes were, respectively, collected. Subsequently, the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to investigate the potential risk factors for LNM in ccRCC. Finally, Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival plots of overall survival (OS) and ccRCC-specific survival (CSS) were evaluated on the basis of different tumor sizes. A total of 8,292 patients were finally enrolled in the study, 1,170 of whom (14.11%) had LNM. According to the heatmap, we could intuitively interpret that larger tumor size was related to an increased risk of LNM obviously. The risk of LNM was evidently greater for larger tumor size (4-7 cm: OR = 2.415, 95% CI = 1.708-3.415; 7-10 cm: OR = 3.746, 95% CI = 2.677-5.242; and >10 cm: OR = 4.617, 95% CI = 3.302-6.457) compared with smaller tumor size (≤4 cm). According to the KM survival plots of OS and CSS, we observed a gradual decline in survival with increasing tumor size, while the smallest tumor size had the best survival outcomes. These results indicated the positive relationship of tumor size with risk of LNM in ccRCC. And we also noticed continual decrease survival rates of OS and CSS with increasing tumor size.

Identifiers

PMID33178275
PMCPMC7648693
OpenAlexW3097297818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.