Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33178269›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of endocrinology2020

Sarcopenia in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.

L M Pechmann, T H Jonasson, V S Canossa, H Trierweiler, G Kisielewicz, R R Petterle, C A Moreira, V Z C Borba

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of endocrinology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prevalence, risk factors and adverse health outcomes of osteosarcopenia in middle-aged and older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus-a scoping review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L M PechmannInternal Medicine and Endocrine Division (SEMPR), Universidade Federal do Paraná, Centro de Diabetes Curitiba, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2965-5268
T H JonassonEndocrine Division, Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade Federal Do Paraná (SEMPR), Avenida Agostinho Leão Júnior, 285, Alto da Glória, Curitiba, PR 80030-110, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1857-4737
V S CanossaUniversidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7062-7085
H TrierweilerUniversidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4879-587X
G KisielewiczUniversidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
R R PetterleDepartment of Integrative Medicine, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7735-1077
C A MoreiraEndocrine Division, Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade Federal Do Paraná (SEMPR), Avenida Agostinho Leão Júnior, 285, Alto da Glória, Curitiba, PR 80030-110, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9908-4907
V Z C BorbaEndocrine Division, Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade Federal Do Paraná (SEMPR), Avenida Agostinho Leão Júnior, 285, Alto da Glória, Curitiba, PR 80030-110, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0555-0880
Universidade Federal do Paraná · BRHospital de Clínicas Universidade Federal do Paraná · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to compare the prevalence of low muscle mass and sarcopenia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) versus paired controls (control group, CG) and the association between sarcopenia and chronic diabetes complications.

methodsMen and women ≥50 years with T2DM (T2DM group, T2DMG) were recruited during routine outpatient visits. Total body densitometry and handgrip strength (HGS) were evaluated in the T2DMG and CG, while the T2DMG was also evaluated for the physical performance using the gait speed (GS) test. Sarcopenia was diagnosed according to the criteria of the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Sarcopenia Project (FNIH).

resultsThe study included 177 individuals in the T2DMG and 146 in the CG. The mean HGS value was lower in the T2DMG (24.4 ± 10.3 kg) compared with the CG (30.9 ± 9.15 kg),

conclusionPatients with T2DM presenting with albuminuria, osteoporosis, and increased %TF were more likely to have sarcopenia. This finding emphasizes the need for patients with T2DM to be evaluated for sarcopenia to allow for early implementation of measures to prevent or treat this disorder.

Identifiers

PMID33178269
PMCPMC7644336
OpenAlexW3095954036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.