Littermate-Controlled Experiments Reveal Eosinophils Are Not Essential for Maintaining Steady-State IgA and Demonstrate the Influence of Rearing Conditions on Antibody Phenotypes in Eosinophil-Deficient Mice.

Conflicting data has emerged regarding a role for eosinophils in IgA production, with some reports that eosinophils support both secretory and circulating IgA levels during homeostasis. Previous studies have compared antibody levels between wildtype and eosinophil-deficient mice, but these mice were obtained from different commercial vendors and/or were not littermates. Thus, the possibility remains that extrinsic environmental factors, rather than an intrinsic lack of eosinophils, are responsible for the reports of reduced IgA in eosinophil-deficient mice. Here we used wild-type and eosinophil-deficient (ΔdblGATA) mice that were purchased from a single vendor, subsequently bred in-house and either co-housed as adults, co-reared from birth or raised as littermates. We found no differences in the levels of secretory IgA or in the numbers of small intestinal IgA-producing plasma cells between wild-type and ΔdblGATA mice, demonstrating that under controlled steady-state conditions eosinophils are not essential for the maintenance of secretory IgA in the intestinal tract. While we found that levels of IgM and IgE were significantly elevated in the serum of ΔdblGATA mice compared to co-reared or co-housed wild-type mice, no significant differences in these or other circulating antibody isotypes were identified between genotypes in littermate-controlled experiments. Our results demonstrate that eosinophils are not required to maintain secretory or circulating IgA production and the absence of eosinophils does not impact circulating IgG1, IgG2b, IgM, or IgE levels during homeostasis. These findings emphasize the importance of optimally controlling rearing and housing conditions throughout life between mice of different genotypes.