Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33178079›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2020

Make Fitness Fun: Could Novelty Be the Key Determinant for Physical Activity Adherence?

Nemanja Lakicevic, Ambra Gentile, Samira Mehrabi, Samuel Cassar, Kate Parker, Roberto Roklicer, Antonino Bianco, Patrik Drid

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Exploring why young Australians participate in the sport of fencing: Future avenues for sports-based health promotion.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nemanja LakicevicProgram in Health Promotion and Cognitive Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Ambra GentileProgram in Health Promotion and Cognitive Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Samira MehrabiDepartment of Kinesiology, Faculty of Applied Health Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Samuel CassarSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Kate ParkerSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Roberto RoklicerFaculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Antonino BiancoDepartment of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Patrik DridFaculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

exercise noveltyexercise prescriptionflow statehealth benefitsmotivationsport participation

Identifiers

PMID33178079
PMCPMC7593334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.