Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33177987›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2020

On the Organization of the Locomotor CPG: Insights From Split-Belt Locomotion and Mathematical Modeling.

Elizaveta M Latash, Charly G Lecomte, Simon M Danner, Alain Frigon, Ilya A Rybak, Yaroslav I Molkov

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Elizaveta M LatashDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Charly G LecomteDepartment of Pharmacology-Physiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Simon M DannerDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Alain FrigonDepartment of Pharmacology-Physiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Ilya A RybakDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Yaroslav I MolkovDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Drexel University · USGeorgia State University · USUniversité de Sherbrooke · CA

Funding

Limb coordination during locomotion before and after spinal cord injuryR01NS110550 · NINDS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BORIS I PRILUTSKY, Ilya A Rybak · 2020 to 2026
$3.9M
Spinal cord neural circuits for left-right and flexor-extensor coordinationR01NS090919 · NINDS · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI GOULDING, MARTYN D, KIEHN, OLE · 2014 to 2018
$3.1M
Propriopsinal neuron function in normal and post-SCI locomotionR01NS112304 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI Simon Michael Danner, David SK Magnuson · 2021 to 2026
$3.0M
Neural mechanisms of locomotion evoked by epidural stimulation of the spinal cordR01NS100928 · NINDS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI PRILUTSKY, BORIS I · 2017 to 2021
$2.7M
Spinal circuits for sensorimotor integration and interlimb coordination during locomotionR01NS115900 · NINDS · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI DANNER, SIMON MICHAEL · 2020 to 2024
$1.7M
CRCNS: Organization of the locomotor CPG in the rodent spinal cordR01NS081713 · NINDS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI HARRIS-WARRICK, RONALD M, RYBAK, ILYA A · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS090919NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS100928NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS110550NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS115900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhythmic limb movements during locomotion are controlled by central pattern generator (CPG) circuits located in the spinal cord. It is considered that these circuits are composed of individual rhythm generators (RGs) for each limb interacting with each other through multiple commissural and long propriospinal circuits. The organization and operation of each RG are not fully understood, and different competing theories exist about interactions between its flexor and extensor components, as well as about left-right commissural interactions between the RGs. The central idea of circuit organization proposed in this study is that with an increase of excitatory input to each RG (or an increase in locomotor speed) the rhythmogenic mechanism of the RGs changes from "flexor-driven" rhythmicity to a "classical half-center" mechanism. We test this hypothesis using our experimental data on changes in duration of stance and swing phases in the intact and spinal cats walking on the ground or tied-belt treadmills (symmetric conditions) or split-belt treadmills with different left and right belt speeds (asymmetric conditions). We compare these experimental data with the results of mathematical modeling, in which simulated CPG circuits operate in similar symmetric and asymmetric conditions with matching or differing control drives to the left and right RGs. The obtained results support the proposed concept of state-dependent changes in RG operation and specific commissural interactions between the RGs. The performed simulations and mathematical analysis of model operation under different conditions provide new insights into CPG network organization and limb coordination during locomotion.

Indexed as

central pattern generatorlocomotionmodelingneural circuitssplit-belt

Identifiers

PMID33177987
PMCPMC7596699
OpenAlexW3093331001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.