Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33177961›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of MS care

Comparing Health Promotion and Quality of Life in People with Progressive Versus Nonprogressive Multiple Sclerosis.

Wenhui Zhang, Heather Becker, Alexa Stuifbergen

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of MS care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wenhui Zhang
Heather Becker
Alexa Stuifbergen

Funding

Pilot & Feasibility CoreP30NR015335 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI BROWN, SHARON A · 2014 to 2018
$2.3M
NINR NIH HHS P30 NR015335
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with multiple sclerosis (MS) benefit from engaging in health promotion. Most studies have been conducted with those having relapsing-remitting MS; information about health promotion for those with progressive MS is more limited. In this study, health promotion and quality of life (QOL) for people with progressive versus nonprogressive MS were systematically examined and compared.

methodsThese data are from years 21 and 22 of an ongoing longitudinal study of persons with MS. Participants were compared on demographic, psychosocial, and health promotion factors and 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) QOL subscales. Based on the conceptual framework, barriers, symptom clusters, social supports, and health promotion activities were entered into hierarchical multivariate regressions to predict selected SF-36 subscale scores separately for those with progressive versus nonprogressive MS after controlling for variance associated with years of education and MS incapacity.

resultsAnalyses included 72 respondents with progressive MS and 117 with nonprogressive MS. People with progressive MS reported significantly less frequent health promotion and lower scores on SF-36 physical role limitations and social functioning. Symptoms were a strong and significant predictor for all three SF-36 subscales in both groups. The explained variances in the hierarchical models differed significantly by MS course, with adjusted

conclusionsFindings underscore the importance of symptom severity in relation to health promotion and QOL in people with long-standing MS. Future research should explore additional contributors to QOL for those with progressive MS.

Indexed as

Health promotionMultiple sclerosis (MS)NonprogressiveProgressiveQuality of life (QOL)

Identifiers

PMID33177961
PMCPMC7643846
OpenAlexW3095683653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.