ArticleOpen access emergency medicine : OAEM2020
Immediate Prescription of Oral Antihypertensive Agents in Hypertensive Urgency Patients and the Risk of Revisits with Elevated Blood Pressure.
Article in Open access emergency medicine : OAEM, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Executive Summary of the 2024 Philippine Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Severe Blood Pressure Elevation.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2026Guideline
- Treatment of Hypertensive Crisis in Primary Care Health Facilities in Peru, 2019-2024.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- Antihypertensive prescription is associated with improved 30-day outcomes for discharged hypertensive emergency department patients.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2024Article
- Microneedles and Their Application in Transdermal Delivery of Antihypertensive Drugs-A Review.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe steps and goals of treatment of hypertensive urgencies in the emergency department are not clear. The aim of this study was to compare the risk of revisits with elevated blood pressure in hypertensive urgency patients in the emergency department managed with and without oral antihypertensive medications.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Emergency Medicine Department of Ramathibodi Hospital, a university-affiliated super tertiary care hospital in Bangkok, Thailand, from January 2018 to April 2020. A total of 692 hypertensive urgency patients were enrolled and categorized into oral antihypertensive drugs group and no oral antihypertensive drugs group.
resultsThere were 298 patients in the antihypertensive drugs group and 394 patients in the no antihypertensive drugs group. There were no statistically significant differences of revisit rate with elevated blood pressure between oral antihypertensive drugs group and no antihypertensive drugs group within 1 day (4.36% vs 6.35%,
conclusionWe have found no obvious evidence of benefit from oral antihypertensive agents in managing hypertensive urgencies in the ED. Oral hypertensive agents had no benefit in the reduction of blood pressure, no effect on reduction of ED length of stay, and blood pressure control within 2 weeks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.