Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33177067›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2021

Normal Tone-In-Noise Sensitivity in Trained Budgerigars despite Substantial Auditory-Nerve Injury: No Evidence of Hidden Hearing Loss.

Kenneth S Henry, Kristina S Abrams

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Midbrain-Level Neural Correlates of Behavioral Tone-in-Noise Detection: Dependence on Energy and Envelope Cues.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kenneth S HenryDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14642 kenneth_henry@urmc.rochester.edu.
Kristina S AbramsDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14642.
University of Rochester · US

Funding

Behavioral and physiological consequences of auditory nerve lossR01DC017519 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Kenneth Stuart Henry · 2019 to 2026
$3.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loss of auditory-nerve (AN) afferent cochlear innervation is a prevalent human condition that does not affect audiometric thresholds and therefore remains largely undetectable with standard clinical tests. AN loss is widely expected to cause hearing difficulties in noise, known as "hidden hearing loss," but support for this hypothesis is controversial. Here, we used operant conditioning procedures to examine the perceptual impact of AN loss on behavioral tone-in-noise (TIN) sensitivity in the budgerigar (

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionNoiseAnimalsAuditory ThresholdCochleaCochlear NerveConditioning, OperantCuesEnergy MetabolismEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsFemaleHearing LossHearing Loss, SensorineuralKainic AcidMaleExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsKainic Acidcochlear synaptopathydecision-variable correlationhidden hearing lossoperant conditioningsensorineural hearing loss

Identifiers

PMID33177067
PMCPMC7786208
OpenAlexW3098242367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.