Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33176926›Full record

ArticleClinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)2021

Establishment of normative biometric data for body composition based on computed tomography in a North American cohort.

P J Navin, M R Moynagh, E J Atkinson, P Tirumanisetty, N K LeBrasseur, A Kumar, S Khosla, N Takahashi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Future of CT body composition research: Methodological discrepancies and advances.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

P J NavinDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
M R MoynaghDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
E J AtkinsonDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
P TirumanisettyDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
N K LeBrasseurDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
A KumarDepartment of Gynecological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
S KhoslaDepartment of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
N TakahashiDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA. Electronic address: Takahashi.Naoki@mayo.edu.

Funding

Mayo Clinic Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCaTS UL1 Supplement - Dr. Timothy Curry)UL1TR002377 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI VESNA D GAROVIC · 2017 to 2026
$78.4M
EPIDEMIOLOGY OF AGE-RELATED BONE LOSS, &FRACTURESR01AR027065 · NIAMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI AMIN, SHREYASEE, KHOSLA, SUNDEEP · 1986 to 2020
$14.9M
Interdisciplinary Infrastructure for Aging Research: Rochester Epidemiology ProjectR33AG058738 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LEBRASSEUR, NATHAN K, OLSON, JANET E · 2020 to 2022
$2.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002377NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR027065NIA NIH HHS R33 AG058738
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsAccurate and reproducible biomarkers are required to allow a more personalized approach to patient care. Body composition is one such biomarker affecting outcomes in a range of surgical and oncological conditions. The aim of this study is to determine the age and sex specific distribution of body composition data, based on information gathered from computed tomography (CT).

methodsThis prospective study used healthy subjects from the medical records linkage of the Rochester Epidemiology Project, based in Minnesota, USA. Each patient had a CT scan without intravenous contrast performed between 1999 and 2001. Quantification was performed using previously validated semi-automated in-house developed software for body composition analysis. Subcutaneous adipose tissue area, visceral adipose tissue area, intermuscular adipose tissue area and skeletal muscle area were measured and indexed to subject height. Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale and Shape were used to assess the location, scale, and shape of each variable across age, stratified by sex. Z-scores specific to sex were assessed for each of the parameters analyzed. Age-specific z-scores were calculated using the formula: Z = (Index Variable - μ)/σ or Z = (√ (Index Variable) - μ)/σ.

resultsThere were 692 subjects enrolled in the study. The fitted model equation was offered for each variable with values presented for μ and σ. Modelling with penalized splines was performed for VAT index, IMAT index and total adipose tissue index. Scatterplots of each variable were produced with lines of Z-scores as a visual representation.

conclusionThis study offers comparative data to allow comparison amongst multiple populations. This will form an important reference for future research and clinical practice.

Indexed as

Body CompositionAdipose TissueAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBody WeightFemaleHumansIntra-Abdominal FatMaleMiddle AgedMuscle, SkeletalProspective StudiesReference ValuesSubcutaneous FatTomography, X-Ray ComputedBody compositionComputed tomographyNormative dataSarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID33176926
PMCPMC9214772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.