ArticleClinical epigenetics2020
Triage of hrHPV-positive women: comparison of two commercial methylation-specific PCR assays.
Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Triage Performance of FAM19A4/miR124-2 Methylation: 18-Month Follow-Up Results From a Prospective Observational Study Within the Dutch Primary HPV-Based Cervical Screening Program.International journal of cancer · 2026Observational
- HPV-Driven Cervical Carcinogenesis: Genetic and Epigenetic Mechanisms and Diagnostic Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Advances in the application of gene methylation detection in cervical cancer screening.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- DNA Methylation in Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Cervical Cancer: Triage and Management.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2026Review
- Diagnostic Accuracy of DNA Methylation Markers for Detecting Cervical Precancer and Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2026Review
- Risk-based triage strategy by extended HPV genotyping for women with ASC-US cytology.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical validation of a three-marker methylation panel to detect CIN3+ in vaginal self-samples in the Dutch population-based screening programme.Clinical epigenetics · 2025Article
- Prospective Study on Clinical Performance of Host DNA Methylation Assay for Triage in Women Who Are HPV-Positive - 4 Provinces, China, 2018-2021.China CDC weekly · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the multiple HPV-based "screen and triage" algorithms in real-world settings of rural China.Cancer biology & medicine · 2025Article
- The DNA Methylation MarkerCancers · 2025Article
- Article
- DNA methylation signatures of cervical pre-invasive and invasive disease: An epigenome-wide association study.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Predictive Performance of miR-124-2 and FAM19A4 for Cervical Lesions in a Single Center from Romania: A Prospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Risk-Based Triage Strategy by Extended HPV Genotyping for Women With LSIL Cytology: A Real-World Study.Journal of medical virology · 2025Article
- Colposcopy referrals and CIN3 detection after triage by host cell DNA methylation and/or HPV genotyping in HPV positive women with low-grade cytology from a population-based Dutch primary HPV screening trial.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Non-invasive diagnosis of vulvar dysplasia using cervical methylation markers-a case control study.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- Human papillomavirus-mediated cervical cancer: epigenetic interplay and clinical implications.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- A Predictive Model Using Six Genes DNA Methylation Markers to Identify Individuals With High Risks of High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions and Cervical Cancer.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
- Accuracy of GynTectCancers · 2024Article
- Assessing the Methylation Status of Two Potential Key Factors Involved in Cervical Oncogenesis.Reports (MDPI) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimHigh-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV)-based screening is becoming increasingly important, either by supplementing or replacing the traditional cytology-based cervical Pap smear. However, hrHPV screening lacks specificity, because it cannot differentiate between transient virus infection and clinically relevant hrHPV-induced disease. Therefore, reliable triage methods are needed for the identification of HPV-positive women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in need of treatment. Promising tools discussed for the triage of these patients are molecular diagnostic tests based on epigenetic markers. Here, we compare the performance of two commercially available DNA methylation-based diagnostic assays-GynTect® and the QIAsure Methylation Test-in physician-taken cervical scrapes from 195 subjects.
findingsBoth GynTect® and the QIAsure Methylation Test detected all cervical carcinoma and carcinoma in situ (CIS). The differences observed in the detection rates between both assays for the different grades of cervical lesions (QIAsure Methylation Test: CIN1 26.7%, CIN2 27.8% and CIN3 74.3%; GynTect®: CIN1 13.3%, CIN2 33.3% and CIN3 60%) were not significant. Concerning the false-positive rates, significant differences were evident. For the healthy (NILM) hrHPV-positive group, the false-positive rates were 5.7% for GynTect® and 26.4% for QIAsure Methylation Test (p = 0.003) and for the NILM hrHPV-negative group 2.2% vs. 23.9% (p = 0.006), respectively. When considering hrHPV-positive samples only for comparison (n = 149), GynTect® delivered significantly higher specificity compared to the QIAsure Methylation Test for CIN2 + (87.6% vs. 67.4% (p < 0.001)) and CIN3 + (84.1% vs. 68.2% (p = 0.002)). Overall our findings suggest that DNA methylation-based tests are suitable for the triage of hrHPV-positive women. With the goal to provide a triage test that complements the limited specificity of HPV testing in HPV-based screening, GynTect® may be preferable, due to its higher specificity for CIN2+ or CIN3+ .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.