Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33176878›Full record

ArticleClinical epigenetics2020

Triage of hrHPV-positive women: comparison of two commercial methylation-specific PCR assays.

Carolin Dippmann, Martina Schmitz, Kristina Wunsch, Stefanie Schütze, Katrin Beer, Christiane Greinke, Hans Ikenberg, Heike Hoyer, Ingo B Runnebaum, Alfred Hansel and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Accuracy of GynTectCancers · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Carolin DippmannKlinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Fortpflanzungsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Martina SchmitzOncgnostics GmbH, Winzerlaer Straße 2, 07745, Jena, Germany.
Kristina WunschOncgnostics GmbH, Winzerlaer Straße 2, 07745, Jena, Germany.
Stefanie SchützeKlinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Fortpflanzungsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Katrin BeerKlinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Fortpflanzungsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Christiane GreinkeKlinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Fortpflanzungsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Hans IkenbergMVZ CytoMol, Berner Straße 76, 60437, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Heike HoyerInstitut Für Medizinische Statistik, Informatik und Datenwissenschaften, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Bachstraße 18, 07743 Jena, Germany.
Ingo B RunnebaumKlinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Fortpflanzungsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Alfred HanselOncgnostics GmbH, Winzerlaer Straße 2, 07745, Jena, Germany.
Matthias DürstKlinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Fortpflanzungsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany. matthias.duerst@med.uni-jena.de.ORCID 0000-0003-1235-1150
Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Fortpflanzungsmedizin · DEoncgnostics (Germany) · DEJena University Hospital · DEMedizinisches Versorgungszentrum Prof. Mathey, Prof. Schofer · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimHigh-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV)-based screening is becoming increasingly important, either by supplementing or replacing the traditional cytology-based cervical Pap smear. However, hrHPV screening lacks specificity, because it cannot differentiate between transient virus infection and clinically relevant hrHPV-induced disease. Therefore, reliable triage methods are needed for the identification of HPV-positive women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in need of treatment. Promising tools discussed for the triage of these patients are molecular diagnostic tests based on epigenetic markers. Here, we compare the performance of two commercially available DNA methylation-based diagnostic assays-GynTect® and the QIAsure Methylation Test-in physician-taken cervical scrapes from 195 subjects.

findingsBoth GynTect® and the QIAsure Methylation Test detected all cervical carcinoma and carcinoma in situ (CIS). The differences observed in the detection rates between both assays for the different grades of cervical lesions (QIAsure Methylation Test: CIN1 26.7%, CIN2 27.8% and CIN3 74.3%; GynTect®: CIN1 13.3%, CIN2 33.3% and CIN3 60%) were not significant. Concerning the false-positive rates, significant differences were evident. For the healthy (NILM) hrHPV-positive group, the false-positive rates were 5.7% for GynTect® and 26.4% for QIAsure Methylation Test (p = 0.003) and for the NILM hrHPV-negative group 2.2% vs. 23.9% (p = 0.006), respectively. When considering hrHPV-positive samples only for comparison (n = 149), GynTect® delivered significantly higher specificity compared to the QIAsure Methylation Test for CIN2 + (87.6% vs. 67.4% (p < 0.001)) and CIN3 + (84.1% vs. 68.2% (p = 0.002)). Overall our findings suggest that DNA methylation-based tests are suitable for the triage of hrHPV-positive women. With the goal to provide a triage test that complements the limited specificity of HPV testing in HPV-based screening, GynTect® may be preferable, due to its higher specificity for CIN2+ or CIN3+ .

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinomaCarcinoma in SituCervix UteriDNA MethylationEarly Detection of CancerEpigenomicsFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPapanicolaou TestPapillomaviridaeCervical cancerCINDNA methylationEpigenetic markersHPVTriage

Identifiers

PMID33176878
PMCPMC7661165
OpenAlexW3102683374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.